Yalantis vs EPAM Systems: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Yalantis (4.3/5) edges ahead of EPAM Systems (3.9/5) overall. Yalantis is the better choice for consumer IoT products where app UX decides adoption. EPAM Systems is the stronger option for fortune 500 firms adding IoT to enterprise systems. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Yalantis vs EPAM Systems: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Yalantis | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2008 | 1993 |
| HQ | Warsaw, Poland (engineering in Ukraine) | Newtown, Pennsylvania, USA |
| Team size | 201–500 | 50,000+ |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Long mobile-app history combined with a newly expanded hardware and embedded practice | Publicly listed enterprise vendor that ties IoT data into large data and cloud estates |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team | Time and materials, dedicated team, managed services |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter | AWS, Azure, Google Cloud |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Smart home, Logistics, Fintech | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Retail, Financial services, Energy |
Yalantis vs EPAM Systems: overview
Yalantis
Yalantis began as a mobile app studio in Dnipro in 2008 and is now headquartered in Warsaw. In November 2025 the company announced a strategic shift toward IoT products covering both hardware and software, along with new leadership hires and planned offices in the US and EU. Its services page lists embedded development, IoT consulting and hardware development, and Rust adoption. Mobile is where it has the longest record, and that matters for IoT buyers whose product lives or dies on the app experience.
EPAM Systems
EPAM was founded in 1993 and is headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania, with more than 50,000 staff. It is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and works mostly for large enterprises. Connected-product and industrial IoT work happens inside its broader engineering, data and cloud practices. Its scale and compliance are real advantages, but IoT apps are a narrow slice of what it does.
Services and capabilities: Yalantis vs EPAM Systems
| Capability | Yalantis | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware design | ✗ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Yalantis vs EPAM Systems
| Framework / platform | Yalantis | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| MQTT | N/A | N/A |
| Swift | ✓ | N/A |
| Kotlin | ✓ | N/A |
| Flutter | ✓ | N/A |
| React Native | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Yalantis vs EPAM Systems
| Criterion | Yalantis | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time and materials, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Time and materials, Managed services |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Yalantis vs EPAM Systems
| Dimension | Yalantis | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Smart home, Logistics | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Retail |
| Best use cases | Building a polished consumer app for a connected wellness or medical device., Adding device pairing, onboarding and remote control to an existing product app. | Connecting factory telemetry to an enterprise data platform., Building internal apps that use device data across a large company. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Yalantis vs EPAM Systems: pros and cons
| Yalantis | |
|---|---|
| + | More than 15 years of native mobile app work, which shows in companion-app quality |
| + | Healthcare compliance experience (HIPAA-style data handling) carries over to medical IoT apps |
| + | EU headquarters simplifies GDPR terms for European buyers |
| + | Rust adoption for device-side code is unusual among app-led vendors |
| - | The hardware-focused IoT strategy dates from late 2025, so its hardware track record is still short |
| - | Rates are higher than smaller Ukrainian IoT specialists |
| - | Mixed headcount figures between Gartner and Clutch |
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Public-company governance and financial reporting |
| + | Strong data engineering for analysing large telemetry volumes |
| + | Global delivery footprint |
| - | IoT app development is a small part of a broad enterprise portfolio |
| - | Little hardware or firmware work |
| - | Pricing and process are built for large enterprises and rarely fit startup budgets |
Who should choose Yalantis?
A typical fit: building a polished consumer app for a connected wellness or medical device.
Long mobile-app history combined with a newly expanded hardware and embedded practice. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Smart home, Logistics, Fintech.
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: connecting factory telemetry to an enterprise data platform.
Publicly listed enterprise vendor that ties IoT data into large data and cloud estates. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Retail, Financial services, Energy.
Decision matrix: Yalantis vs EPAM Systems
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Yalantis |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Yalantis |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Yalantis (Not published) vs EPAM Systems (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | EPAM Systems |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Yalantis |
Use case fit: Yalantis vs EPAM Systems
| Use case | Yalantis fit | EPAM Systems fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building a polished consumer app for a connected wellness or medical device. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Adding device pairing, onboarding and remote control to an existing product app. | Strong | Limited | Yalantis |
| Connecting factory telemetry to an enterprise data platform. | Limited | Strong | EPAM Systems |
| Building internal apps that use device data across a large company. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Yalantis vs EPAM Systems
Yalantis (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Long mobile-app history combined with a newly expanded hardware and embedded practice.
EPAM Systems (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need building internal apps that use device data across a large company. If your situation matches that, EPAM Systems is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Yalantis vs EPAM Systems FAQ
Is Yalantis better than EPAM Systems?
Yalantis (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Yalantis's strongest advantage: more than 15 years of native mobile app work, which shows in companion-app quality. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: public-company governance and financial reporting.
How do Yalantis and EPAM Systems differ in pricing?
Yalantis uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. EPAM Systems uses time and materials, dedicated team, managed services pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Yalantis or EPAM Systems?
Yalantis is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Yalantis and EPAM Systems?
Yalantis's primary differentiator is: long mobile-app history combined with a newly expanded hardware and embedded practice. EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: publicly listed enterprise vendor that ties IoT data into large data and cloud estates. They also differ in team size (201–500 vs 50,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Smart home vs Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.