Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of EPAM Systems (3.9/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for connected products needing device, cloud and app from one vendor. EPAM Systems is the stronger option for fortune 500 firms adding IoT to enterprise systems. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 1993 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Newtown, Pennsylvania, USA |
| Team size | 200+ | 50,000+ |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and mobile apps delivered by one team with its own hardware lab | Publicly listed enterprise vendor that ties IoT data into large data and cloud estates |
| Pricing model | Fixed price, time and materials, dedicated team | Time and materials, dedicated team, managed services |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | AWS, Azure, Google Cloud | AWS, Azure, Google Cloud |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Agritech, Consumer electronics, Industrial IoT | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Retail, Financial services, Energy |
Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems: overview
Lemberg Solutions
An IoT app is only as reliable as the firmware and cloud it talks to, and Lemberg Solutions is one of the few vendors on this list that builds all three in-house. Founded in 2007, the company has 200+ employees and offices in Lviv, Hamburg, London and Kraków. Its IoT work covers consulting, cloud architecture with device management and OTA updates, iOS, Android and web apps, embedded software, PCB design and prototyping, all backed by an in-house lab. Named clients include Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink and Bosch Rexroth, and the published case studies include telemetry for Voltfang's energy storage systems and control software for a 360 kW EV charging station.
EPAM Systems
EPAM was founded in 1993 and is headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania, with more than 50,000 staff. It is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and works mostly for large enterprises. Connected-product and industrial IoT work happens inside its broader engineering, data and cloud practices. Its scale and compliance are real advantages, but IoT apps are a narrow slice of what it does.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MQTT | N/A | N/A |
| Swift | N/A | N/A |
| Kotlin | N/A | N/A |
| Flutter | N/A | N/A |
| React Native | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Team extension, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Time and materials, Managed services |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Automotive, Energy | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Retail |
| Best use cases | Building an iOS and Android app together with the firmware and cloud for a new connected device., Adding remote monitoring, OTA updates and telemetry to an existing industrial or energy product. | Connecting factory telemetry to an enterprise data platform., Building internal apps that use device data across a large company. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | One team owns the firmware, cloud back end and companion app, so protocol changes on the device side do not break the app silently |
| + | ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certified, with ISO 13485 listed for medical device work |
| + | Partnerships with semiconductor vendors including NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics help with chip selection and board support |
| + | Edge AI and computer vision experience, from sensor integration to on-device inference |
| + | All intellectual property transfers to the client |
| + | An in-house lab lets the team test apps against real prototypes instead of simulators |
| - | Mass production is not handled in-house, so you need a separate contract manufacturer for volume builds |
| - | The company does not obtain regulatory certification on the client's behalf; it supplies documentation and engineering support for approvals |
| - | A team built for hardware-to-cloud projects is more than you need for a simple app on top of an existing, stable device API |
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Public-company governance and financial reporting |
| + | Strong data engineering for analysing large telemetry volumes |
| + | Global delivery footprint |
| - | IoT app development is a small part of a broad enterprise portfolio |
| - | Little hardware or firmware work |
| - | Pricing and process are built for large enterprises and rarely fit startup budgets |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: building an iOS and Android app together with the firmware and cloud for a new connected device.
Electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and mobile apps delivered by one team with its own hardware lab. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Agritech, Consumer electronics, Industrial IoT.
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: connecting factory telemetry to an enterprise data platform.
Publicly listed enterprise vendor that ties IoT data into large data and cloud estates. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Retail, Financial services, Energy.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs EPAM Systems (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | EPAM Systems fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building an iOS and Android app together with the firmware and cloud for a new connected device. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Adding remote monitoring, OTA updates and telemetry to an existing industrial or energy product. | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Connecting factory telemetry to an enterprise data platform. | Limited | Strong | EPAM Systems |
| Building internal apps that use device data across a large company. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and mobile apps delivered by one team with its own hardware lab.
EPAM Systems (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need building internal apps that use device data across a large company. If your situation matches that, EPAM Systems is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than EPAM Systems?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: one team owns the firmware, cloud back end and companion app, so protocol changes on the device side do not break the app silently. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: public-company governance and financial reporting.
How do Lemberg Solutions and EPAM Systems differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses fixed price, time and materials, dedicated team pricing. EPAM Systems uses time and materials, dedicated team, managed services pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or EPAM Systems?
EPAM Systems is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and EPAM Systems?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and mobile apps delivered by one team with its own hardware lab. EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: publicly listed enterprise vendor that ties IoT data into large data and cloud estates. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 50,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Automotive vs Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.