Krasamo vs EPAM Systems: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Krasamo (4.0/5) edges ahead of EPAM Systems (3.9/5) overall. Krasamo is the better choice for north American OEMs wanting nearshore IoT app teams. EPAM Systems is the stronger option for fortune 500 firms adding IoT to enterprise systems. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Krasamo vs EPAM Systems: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Krasamo | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2010 | 1993 |
| HQ | Plano, Texas, USA (offices in Mexico and Panama) | Newtown, Pennsylvania, USA |
| Team size | 50–249 | 50,000+ |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | US consultancy with Mexico and Panama delivery working in American time zones | Publicly listed enterprise vendor that ties IoT data into large data and cloud estates |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price | Time and materials, dedicated team, managed services |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter | AWS, Azure, Google Cloud |
| Industries served | Smart home, Consumer electronics, Industrial manufacturing, Retail | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Retail, Financial services, Energy |
Krasamo vs EPAM Systems: overview
Krasamo
Krasamo was founded in 2010 and works from Plano, Texas, with nearshore offices in Aguascalientes, Mexico and Panama. Craft describes it as an enterprise consultancy focused on IoT and digital modernisation, and a Clutch project listing covers IoT app development for a home security manufacturer. Team estimates vary from about two dozen to 249 depending on the directory. It suits North American buyers who want same-time-zone nearshore delivery.
EPAM Systems
EPAM was founded in 1993 and is headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania, with more than 50,000 staff. It is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and works mostly for large enterprises. Connected-product and industrial IoT work happens inside its broader engineering, data and cloud practices. Its scale and compliance are real advantages, but IoT apps are a narrow slice of what it does.
Services and capabilities: Krasamo vs EPAM Systems
| Capability | Krasamo | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware design | ✗ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Krasamo vs EPAM Systems
| Framework / platform | Krasamo | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MQTT | N/A | N/A |
| Swift | ✓ | N/A |
| Kotlin | ✓ | N/A |
| Flutter | ✓ | N/A |
| React Native | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Krasamo vs EPAM Systems
| Criterion | Krasamo | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials, Dedicated team | Dedicated team, Time and materials, Managed services |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Krasamo vs EPAM Systems
| Dimension | Krasamo | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Smart home, Consumer electronics, Industrial manufacturing | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Retail |
| Best use cases | Building a mobile app for a home security or appliance manufacturer., Adding Matter or cloud-to-cloud integrations to a consumer device app. | Connecting factory telemetry to an enterprise data platform., Building internal apps that use device data across a large company. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Krasamo vs EPAM Systems: pros and cons
| Krasamo | |
|---|---|
| + | Nearshore teams share working hours with US clients |
| + | Appliance and home security app work fits consumer device makers |
| + | Consulting focus helps with product planning before build |
| - | Small team by some estimates, with inconsistent public headcount |
| - | Limited firmware and hardware capability |
| - | Fewer public case studies than larger vendors |
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Public-company governance and financial reporting |
| + | Strong data engineering for analysing large telemetry volumes |
| + | Global delivery footprint |
| - | IoT app development is a small part of a broad enterprise portfolio |
| - | Little hardware or firmware work |
| - | Pricing and process are built for large enterprises and rarely fit startup budgets |
Who should choose Krasamo?
A typical fit: building a mobile app for a home security or appliance manufacturer.
US consultancy with Mexico and Panama delivery working in American time zones. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Smart home, Consumer electronics, Industrial manufacturing, Retail.
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: connecting factory telemetry to an enterprise data platform.
Publicly listed enterprise vendor that ties IoT data into large data and cloud estates. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Retail, Financial services, Energy.
Decision matrix: Krasamo vs EPAM Systems
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Krasamo |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Krasamo |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Krasamo (Not published) vs EPAM Systems (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | EPAM Systems |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Krasamo |
Use case fit: Krasamo vs EPAM Systems
| Use case | Krasamo fit | EPAM Systems fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building a mobile app for a home security or appliance manufacturer. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Adding Matter or cloud-to-cloud integrations to a consumer device app. | Strong | Limited | Krasamo |
| Connecting factory telemetry to an enterprise data platform. | Limited | Strong | EPAM Systems |
| Building internal apps that use device data across a large company. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Krasamo vs EPAM Systems
Krasamo (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. US consultancy with Mexico and Panama delivery working in American time zones.
EPAM Systems (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need building internal apps that use device data across a large company. If your situation matches that, EPAM Systems is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Krasamo vs EPAM Systems FAQ
Is Krasamo better than EPAM Systems?
Krasamo (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Krasamo's strongest advantage: nearshore teams share working hours with US clients. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: public-company governance and financial reporting.
How do Krasamo and EPAM Systems differ in pricing?
Krasamo uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. EPAM Systems uses time and materials, dedicated team, managed services pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Krasamo or EPAM Systems?
Krasamo is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Krasamo and EPAM Systems?
Krasamo's primary differentiator is: US consultancy with Mexico and Panama delivery working in American time zones. EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: publicly listed enterprise vendor that ties IoT data into large data and cloud estates. They also differ in team size (50–249 vs 50,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Smart home, Consumer electronics vs Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.