Best IoT App Development Companies

Infinum vs EPAM Systems: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Infinum (4.0/5) edges ahead of EPAM Systems (3.9/5) overall. Infinum is the better choice for appliance makers consolidating several device apps. EPAM Systems is the stronger option for fortune 500 firms adding IoT to enterprise systems. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Infinum vs EPAM Systems: head-to-head summary

Criterion Infinum EPAM Systems
Founded 2005 1993
HQ Zagreb, Croatia (London office) Newtown, Pennsylvania, USA
Team size 350–450 50,000+
Rating 4.0 / 5 3.9 / 5
Primary differentiator Product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand Publicly listed enterprise vendor that ties IoT data into large data and cloud estates
Pricing model Time and materials, fixed price Time and materials, dedicated team, managed services
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack Swift, Kotlin, Flutter AWS, Azure, Google Cloud
Industries served Consumer electronics, Smart home, Industrial manufacturing, Fintech Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Retail, Financial services, Energy

Infinum vs EPAM Systems: overview

Infinum

Infinum was registered in Zagreb in May 2005 and reported more than 370 people in 2025. Its best-known IoT project is HomeID for Versuni, the Philips appliance maker, which replaced several separate appliance apps with one device companion app and community hub. A Clutch review also describes IoT development and DevOps for a machinery manufacturer on Azure. Infinum is an app and product agency first, with strong design, and does not build hardware.

EPAM Systems

EPAM was founded in 1993 and is headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania, with more than 50,000 staff. It is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and works mostly for large enterprises. Connected-product and industrial IoT work happens inside its broader engineering, data and cloud practices. Its scale and compliance are real advantages, but IoT apps are a narrow slice of what it does.

Services and capabilities: Infinum vs EPAM Systems

Capability Infinum EPAM Systems
Mobile companion apps ✓ ✓
Web dashboards and portals ✓ ✓
IoT cloud back end ✓ ✓
Embedded firmware ✗ ✗
Hardware design ✗ ✗
Edge AI ✗ ✗
Fixed-price projects ✓ ✗
Dedicated team model ✓ ✓

Tech stack comparison: Infinum vs EPAM Systems

Framework / platform Infinum EPAM Systems
AWS ✓ ✓
Azure ✓ ✓
Embedded Linux N/A N/A
BLE N/A N/A
MQTT N/A N/A
Swift ✓ N/A
Kotlin ✓ N/A
Flutter ✓ N/A
React Native N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Infinum vs EPAM Systems

Criterion Infinum EPAM Systems
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Fixed project, Time and materials, Dedicated team Dedicated team, Time and materials, Managed services
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Infinum vs EPAM Systems

Dimension Infinum EPAM Systems
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Consumer electronics, Smart home, Industrial manufacturing Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Retail
Best use cases Merging several appliance apps into one connected-home app., Building the community and content features around a device app. Connecting factory telemetry to an enterprise data platform., Building internal apps that use device data across a large company.
Typical project type Fixed project Dedicated team

Infinum vs EPAM Systems: pros and cons

Infinum
+ Shipped a large consumer appliance IoT app for Versuni (Philips)
+ Strong product design and UX process
+ EU-based with a mature engineering culture
- No firmware or hardware practice
- IoT is one category within a general digital product agency
- Agency rates sit above smaller Eastern European vendors
EPAM Systems
+ Public-company governance and financial reporting
+ Strong data engineering for analysing large telemetry volumes
+ Global delivery footprint
- IoT app development is a small part of a broad enterprise portfolio
- Little hardware or firmware work
- Pricing and process are built for large enterprises and rarely fit startup budgets

Who should choose Infinum?

A typical fit: merging several appliance apps into one connected-home app.

Product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Smart home, Industrial manufacturing, Fintech.

Who should choose EPAM Systems?

A typical fit: connecting factory telemetry to an enterprise data platform.

Publicly listed enterprise vendor that ties IoT data into large data and cloud estates. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Retail, Financial services, Energy.

Decision matrix: Infinum vs EPAM Systems

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Infinum
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Infinum
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Infinum (Not published) vs EPAM Systems (Not published)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical EPAM Systems
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build EPAM Systems

Use case fit: Infinum vs EPAM Systems

Use case Infinum fit EPAM Systems fit Winner
Merging several appliance apps into one connected-home app. Strong Limited Infinum
Building the community and content features around a device app. Strong Strong Both equally
Connecting factory telemetry to an enterprise data platform. Limited Strong EPAM Systems
Building internal apps that use device data across a large company. Strong Strong Both equally
Fixed-price MVP app Limited Limited Both equally
Long-term dedicated team Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Infinum vs EPAM Systems

Infinum (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand.

EPAM Systems (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need building internal apps that use device data across a large company. If your situation matches that, EPAM Systems is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Infinum vs EPAM Systems FAQ

Is Infinum better than EPAM Systems?

Infinum (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Infinum's strongest advantage: shipped a large consumer appliance IoT app for Versuni (Philips). EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: public-company governance and financial reporting.

How do Infinum and EPAM Systems differ in pricing?

Infinum uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. EPAM Systems uses time and materials, dedicated team, managed services pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Infinum or EPAM Systems?

Infinum is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Infinum and EPAM Systems?

Infinum's primary differentiator is: product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand. EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: publicly listed enterprise vendor that ties IoT data into large data and cloud estates. They also differ in team size (350–450 vs 50,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Consumer electronics, Smart home vs Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.