Best IoT App Development Companies

SumatoSoft vs MobiDev: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

SumatoSoft (4.2/5) edges ahead of MobiDev (4.1/5) overall. SumatoSoft is the better choice for app and dashboard builds on off-the-shelf sensors. MobiDev is the stronger option for app-heavy IoT products with AI or AR features. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

SumatoSoft vs MobiDev: head-to-head summary

Criterion SumatoSoft MobiDev
Founded 2012 2009
HQ Boston, MA, USA Atlanta, Georgia, USA (R&D in Ukraine and Poland)
Team size 51–200 250–500
Rating 4.2 / 5 4.1 / 5
Primary differentiator Focused on the app and cloud side of IoT, with a US contracting entity Mobile and web development history plus applied AI and AR work for connected products
Pricing model Fixed price, time and materials Time and materials, dedicated team
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack AWS IoT, Azure IoT, Ruby on Rails Swift, Kotlin, Flutter
Industries served Logistics, Retail, Healthcare, Industrial manufacturing Healthcare, Retail, Industrial manufacturing, Smart home

SumatoSoft vs MobiDev: overview

SumatoSoft

SumatoSoft was founded in 2012 and has its headquarters at One Boston Place, with directory headcounts of 51 to 200. IoT is one of its named practices, alongside custom web and mobile development, and its published work centres on monitoring apps, asset tracking and the web dashboards that sit behind them. It does not design hardware, so it suits projects where the devices already exist or come from a hardware partner. It is a sensible mid-budget pick for app and cloud work on top of off-the-shelf sensors.

MobiDev

Oleg Lola founded MobiDev in Kharkiv in 2009, and the company still runs under his leadership with US and UK legal entities and R&D centres in Ukraine and Poland. Its own company report put the team at 447 people in mid-2022. Connected-device projects joined its mobile and web work around 2014, and it now publishes on AI, AR and IoT. Most of its IoT strength sits in the app and data side rather than in firmware or hardware.

Services and capabilities: SumatoSoft vs MobiDev

Capability SumatoSoft MobiDev
Mobile companion apps ✓ ✓
Web dashboards and portals ✓ ✓
IoT cloud back end ✓ ✓
Embedded firmware ✗ ✗
Hardware design ✗ ✗
Edge AI ✗ ✓
Fixed-price projects ✓ ✗
Dedicated team model ✓ ✓

Tech stack comparison: SumatoSoft vs MobiDev

Framework / platform SumatoSoft MobiDev
AWS ✓ ✓
Azure ✓ ✓
Embedded Linux N/A N/A
BLE N/A N/A
MQTT ✓ N/A
Swift N/A ✓
Kotlin N/A ✓
Flutter N/A ✓
React Native ✓ N/A

Pricing comparison: SumatoSoft vs MobiDev

Criterion SumatoSoft MobiDev
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Fixed project, Time and materials, Dedicated team Dedicated team, Time and materials
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: SumatoSoft vs MobiDev

Dimension SumatoSoft MobiDev
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Logistics, Retail, Healthcare Healthcare, Retail, Industrial manufacturing
Best use cases Building an asset tracking web and mobile app on commercial GPS trackers., Creating an environmental monitoring dashboard for off-the-shelf sensors. Adding on-device AI to a connected camera or retail sensor app., Building an AR maintenance app that reads live equipment data.
Typical project type Fixed project Dedicated team

SumatoSoft vs MobiDev: pros and cons

SumatoSoft
+ US legal entity with lower blended rates than US-only engineering firms
+ Strong on web dashboards and admin tools that IoT products often neglect
+ Clear fit for monitoring and tracking apps on commercial hardware
- No hardware design or deep firmware practice
- IoT is one practice among several general software services
- Older directory listings give conflicting founding details
MobiDev
+ More than 15 years of mobile app delivery
+ Applied AI and AR experience for apps that interpret device data
+ Relocated most staff to safer offices in Chernivtsi and Łódź after 2022
- Little hardware or deep firmware work
- Headquarters is listed differently across sources (Atlanta, Norcross, Sacramento)
- IoT is a secondary practice next to general app development

Who should choose SumatoSoft?

A typical fit: building an asset tracking web and mobile app on commercial GPS trackers.

Focused on the app and cloud side of IoT, with a US contracting entity. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Logistics, Retail, Healthcare, Industrial manufacturing.

Who should choose MobiDev?

A typical fit: adding on-device AI to a connected camera or retail sensor app.

Mobile and web development history plus applied AI and AR work for connected products. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Retail, Industrial manufacturing, Smart home.

Decision matrix: SumatoSoft vs MobiDev

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope SumatoSoft
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme SumatoSoft
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: SumatoSoft (Not published) vs MobiDev (Not published)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical SumatoSoft
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build SumatoSoft

Use case fit: SumatoSoft vs MobiDev

Use case SumatoSoft fit MobiDev fit Winner
Building an asset tracking web and mobile app on commercial GPS trackers. Strong Strong Both equally
Creating an environmental monitoring dashboard for off-the-shelf sensors. Strong Limited SumatoSoft
Adding on-device AI to a connected camera or retail sensor app. Limited Strong MobiDev
Building an AR maintenance app that reads live equipment data. Strong Strong Both equally
Fixed-price MVP app Limited Limited Both equally
Long-term dedicated team Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: SumatoSoft vs MobiDev

SumatoSoft (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Focused on the app and cloud side of IoT, with a US contracting entity.

MobiDev (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need building an AR maintenance app that reads live equipment data. If your situation matches that, MobiDev is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

SumatoSoft vs MobiDev FAQ

Is SumatoSoft better than MobiDev?

SumatoSoft (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. SumatoSoft's strongest advantage: US legal entity with lower blended rates than US-only engineering firms. MobiDev's strongest advantage: more than 15 years of mobile app delivery.

How do SumatoSoft and MobiDev differ in pricing?

SumatoSoft uses fixed price, time and materials pricing. MobiDev uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: SumatoSoft or MobiDev?

MobiDev is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between SumatoSoft and MobiDev?

SumatoSoft's primary differentiator is: focused on the app and cloud side of IoT, with a US contracting entity. MobiDev's primary differentiator is: mobile and web development history plus applied AI and AR work for connected products. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 250–500), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Logistics, Retail vs Healthcare, Retail).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.