Best IoT App Development Companies

SumatoSoft vs ArcTouch: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

SumatoSoft (4.2/5) edges ahead of ArcTouch (4.0/5) overall. SumatoSoft is the better choice for app and dashboard builds on off-the-shelf sensors. ArcTouch is the stronger option for consumer brands wanting design-led companion apps. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

SumatoSoft vs ArcTouch: head-to-head summary

Criterion SumatoSoft ArcTouch
Founded 2012 2008
HQ Boston, MA, USA San Francisco, California, USA (studio in Florianópolis, Brazil)
Team size 51–200 100–250
Rating 4.2 / 5 4.0 / 5
Primary differentiator Focused on the app and cloud side of IoT, with a US contracting entity Design-first mobile studio for consumer connected products
Pricing model Fixed price, time and materials Time and materials, fixed price
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack AWS IoT, Azure IoT, Ruby on Rails Swift, Kotlin, React Native
Industries served Logistics, Retail, Healthcare, Industrial manufacturing Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Retail, Media

SumatoSoft vs ArcTouch: overview

SumatoSoft

SumatoSoft was founded in 2012 and has its headquarters at One Boston Place, with directory headcounts of 51 to 200. IoT is one of its named practices, alongside custom web and mobile development, and its published work centres on monitoring apps, asset tracking and the web dashboards that sit behind them. It does not design hardware, so it suits projects where the devices already exist or come from a hardware partner. It is a sensible mid-budget pick for app and cloud work on top of off-the-shelf sensors.

ArcTouch

ArcTouch was founded in San Francisco in 2008 and acquired by Grey Group, part of WPP, in January 2016, when it had 97 employees and an office in Florianópolis, Brazil. Its reputation comes from polished consumer apps, including companion apps for wearables and connected products. Design and mobile engineering are its strengths. It does not do firmware or hardware, so it works best when paired with a device engineering partner.

Services and capabilities: SumatoSoft vs ArcTouch

Capability SumatoSoft ArcTouch
Mobile companion apps ✓ ✓
Web dashboards and portals ✓ ✓
IoT cloud back end ✓ ✗
Embedded firmware ✗ ✗
Hardware design ✗ ✗
Edge AI ✗ ✗
Fixed-price projects ✓ ✓
Dedicated team model ✓ ✗

Tech stack comparison: SumatoSoft vs ArcTouch

Framework / platform SumatoSoft ArcTouch
AWS ✓ N/A
Azure ✓ N/A
Embedded Linux N/A N/A
BLE N/A ✓
MQTT ✓ N/A
Swift N/A ✓
Kotlin N/A ✓
Flutter N/A ✓
React Native ✓ ✓

Pricing comparison: SumatoSoft vs ArcTouch

Criterion SumatoSoft ArcTouch
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Fixed project, Time and materials, Dedicated team Fixed project, Time and materials
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: SumatoSoft vs ArcTouch

Dimension SumatoSoft ArcTouch
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Logistics, Retail, Healthcare Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Retail
Best use cases Building an asset tracking web and mobile app on commercial GPS trackers., Creating an environmental monitoring dashboard for off-the-shelf sensors. Designing a premium companion app for a consumer wearable., Redesigning the onboarding and pairing flow of an existing device app.
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

SumatoSoft vs ArcTouch: pros and cons

SumatoSoft
+ US legal entity with lower blended rates than US-only engineering firms
+ Strong on web dashboards and admin tools that IoT products often neglect
+ Clear fit for monitoring and tracking apps on commercial hardware
- No hardware design or deep firmware practice
- IoT is one practice among several general software services
- Older directory listings give conflicting founding details
ArcTouch
+ Consumer app design quality is its main selling point
+ Wearable and watch app experience
+ Brazilian studio helps balance US design-led pricing
- Owned by WPP's Grey Group since 2016, so it is part of an advertising holding company
- No firmware, hardware or deep IoT cloud practice
- Rates reflect US agency pricing

Who should choose SumatoSoft?

A typical fit: building an asset tracking web and mobile app on commercial GPS trackers.

Focused on the app and cloud side of IoT, with a US contracting entity. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Logistics, Retail, Healthcare, Industrial manufacturing.

Who should choose ArcTouch?

A typical fit: designing a premium companion app for a consumer wearable.

Design-first mobile studio for consumer connected products. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Retail, Media.

Decision matrix: SumatoSoft vs ArcTouch

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope SumatoSoft
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme SumatoSoft
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: SumatoSoft (Not published) vs ArcTouch (Not published)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical SumatoSoft
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build SumatoSoft

Use case fit: SumatoSoft vs ArcTouch

Use case SumatoSoft fit ArcTouch fit Winner
Building an asset tracking web and mobile app on commercial GPS trackers. Strong Strong Both equally
Creating an environmental monitoring dashboard for off-the-shelf sensors. Strong Limited SumatoSoft
Designing a premium companion app for a consumer wearable. Limited Strong ArcTouch
Redesigning the onboarding and pairing flow of an existing device app. Limited Strong ArcTouch
Fixed-price MVP app Limited Limited Both equally
Long-term dedicated team Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: SumatoSoft vs ArcTouch

SumatoSoft (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Focused on the app and cloud side of IoT, with a US contracting entity.

ArcTouch (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need redesigning the onboarding and pairing flow of an existing device app. If your situation matches that, ArcTouch is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

SumatoSoft vs ArcTouch FAQ

Is SumatoSoft better than ArcTouch?

SumatoSoft (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. SumatoSoft's strongest advantage: US legal entity with lower blended rates than US-only engineering firms. ArcTouch's strongest advantage: consumer app design quality is its main selling point.

How do SumatoSoft and ArcTouch differ in pricing?

SumatoSoft uses fixed price, time and materials pricing. ArcTouch uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: SumatoSoft or ArcTouch?

ArcTouch is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between SumatoSoft and ArcTouch?

SumatoSoft's primary differentiator is: focused on the app and cloud side of IoT, with a US contracting entity. ArcTouch's primary differentiator is: design-first mobile studio for consumer connected products. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 100–250), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Logistics, Retail vs Consumer electronics, Healthcare).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.