Sirin Software vs MobiDev: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Sirin Software (4.3/5) edges ahead of MobiDev (4.1/5) overall. Sirin Software is the better choice for device startups needing Linux firmware plus a companion app. MobiDev is the stronger option for app-heavy IoT products with AI or AR features. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Sirin Software vs MobiDev: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Sirin Software | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2009 |
| HQ | Pompano Beach, Florida, USA (R&D in Kyiv and Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine) | Atlanta, Georgia, USA (R&D in Ukraine and Poland) |
| Team size | 50–249 | 250–500 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Embedded Linux and SDK work for semiconductor companies, carried through to the consumer app | Mobile and web development history plus applied AI and AR work for connected products |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price | Time and materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded Linux, Yocto, BLE | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter |
| Industries served | Consumer electronics, Semiconductors, Smart home, Agritech | Healthcare, Retail, Industrial manufacturing, Smart home |
Sirin Software vs MobiDev: overview
Sirin Software
Sirin Software is registered in Florida and does its engineering at R&D centres in Kyiv and Ivano-Frankivsk. It has worked since 2014 on embedded Linux, board support, SDKs and the mobile apps that pair with devices. A published Clutch review covers firmware for a smart hose timer that talks to Android and iOS apps and to AWS. The company is small; directory headcounts range from about 37 to 249 depending on the source.
MobiDev
Oleg Lola founded MobiDev in Kharkiv in 2009, and the company still runs under his leadership with US and UK legal entities and R&D centres in Ukraine and Poland. Its own company report put the team at 447 people in mid-2022. Connected-device projects joined its mobile and web work around 2014, and it now publishes on AI, AR and IoT. Most of its IoT strength sits in the app and data side rather than in firmware or hardware.
Services and capabilities: Sirin Software vs MobiDev
| Capability | Sirin Software | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✗ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Sirin Software vs MobiDev
| Framework / platform | Sirin Software | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| MQTT | N/A | N/A |
| Swift | N/A | ✓ |
| Kotlin | N/A | ✓ |
| Flutter | N/A | ✓ |
| React Native | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Sirin Software vs MobiDev
| Criterion | Sirin Software | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials, Team extension | Dedicated team, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Sirin Software vs MobiDev
| Dimension | Sirin Software | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer electronics, Semiconductors, Smart home | Healthcare, Retail, Industrial manufacturing |
| Best use cases | Writing firmware and a companion app for a consumer smart garden or home device., Building SDKs and reference apps for a new chip or development board. | Adding on-device AI to a connected camera or retail sensor app., Building an AR maintenance app that reads live equipment data. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Sirin Software vs MobiDev: pros and cons
| Sirin Software | |
|---|---|
| + | Linux board bring-up and driver work are its main specialty |
| + | Can carry a single BLE or Wi-Fi device from firmware to the AWS back end and phone app |
| + | Ukrainian delivery keeps rates below US-based vendors |
| - | Small team, so it cannot staff a large multi-product programme |
| - | Headcount figures vary a lot between directories |
| - | Web dashboard and enterprise integration experience is thinner than its embedded work |
| MobiDev | |
|---|---|
| + | More than 15 years of mobile app delivery |
| + | Applied AI and AR experience for apps that interpret device data |
| + | Relocated most staff to safer offices in Chernivtsi and Łódź after 2022 |
| - | Little hardware or deep firmware work |
| - | Headquarters is listed differently across sources (Atlanta, Norcross, Sacramento) |
| - | IoT is a secondary practice next to general app development |
Who should choose Sirin Software?
A typical fit: writing firmware and a companion app for a consumer smart garden or home device.
Embedded Linux and SDK work for semiconductor companies, carried through to the consumer app. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Semiconductors, Smart home, Agritech.
Who should choose MobiDev?
A typical fit: adding on-device AI to a connected camera or retail sensor app.
Mobile and web development history plus applied AI and AR work for connected products. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Retail, Industrial manufacturing, Smart home.
Decision matrix: Sirin Software vs MobiDev
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Sirin Software |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | MobiDev |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Sirin Software (Not published) vs MobiDev (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Sirin Software |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Sirin Software vs MobiDev
| Use case | Sirin Software fit | MobiDev fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Writing firmware and a companion app for a consumer smart garden or home device. | Strong | Limited | Sirin Software |
| Building SDKs and reference apps for a new chip or development board. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Adding on-device AI to a connected camera or retail sensor app. | Limited | Strong | MobiDev |
| Building an AR maintenance app that reads live equipment data. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Sirin Software vs MobiDev
Sirin Software (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Embedded Linux and SDK work for semiconductor companies, carried through to the consumer app.
MobiDev (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need building an AR maintenance app that reads live equipment data. If your situation matches that, MobiDev is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Sirin Software vs MobiDev FAQ
Is Sirin Software better than MobiDev?
Sirin Software (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Sirin Software's strongest advantage: linux board bring-up and driver work are its main specialty. MobiDev's strongest advantage: more than 15 years of mobile app delivery.
How do Sirin Software and MobiDev differ in pricing?
Sirin Software uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. MobiDev uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Sirin Software or MobiDev?
MobiDev is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Sirin Software and MobiDev?
Sirin Software's primary differentiator is: embedded Linux and SDK work for semiconductor companies, carried through to the consumer app. MobiDev's primary differentiator is: mobile and web development history plus applied AI and AR work for connected products. They also differ in team size (50–249 vs 250–500), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Consumer electronics, Semiconductors vs Healthcare, Retail).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.