Sirin Software vs Infinum: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Sirin Software (4.3/5) edges ahead of Infinum (4.0/5) overall. Sirin Software is the better choice for device startups needing Linux firmware plus a companion app. Infinum is the stronger option for appliance makers consolidating several device apps. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Sirin Software vs Infinum: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Sirin Software | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2005 |
| HQ | Pompano Beach, Florida, USA (R&D in Kyiv and Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine) | Zagreb, Croatia (London office) |
| Team size | 50–249 | 350–450 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Embedded Linux and SDK work for semiconductor companies, carried through to the consumer app | Product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price | Time and materials, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded Linux, Yocto, BLE | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter |
| Industries served | Consumer electronics, Semiconductors, Smart home, Agritech | Consumer electronics, Smart home, Industrial manufacturing, Fintech |
Sirin Software vs Infinum: overview
Sirin Software
Sirin Software is registered in Florida and does its engineering at R&D centres in Kyiv and Ivano-Frankivsk. It has worked since 2014 on embedded Linux, board support, SDKs and the mobile apps that pair with devices. A published Clutch review covers firmware for a smart hose timer that talks to Android and iOS apps and to AWS. The company is small; directory headcounts range from about 37 to 249 depending on the source.
Infinum
Infinum was registered in Zagreb in May 2005 and reported more than 370 people in 2025. Its best-known IoT project is HomeID for Versuni, the Philips appliance maker, which replaced several separate appliance apps with one device companion app and community hub. A Clutch review also describes IoT development and DevOps for a machinery manufacturer on Azure. Infinum is an app and product agency first, with strong design, and does not build hardware.
Services and capabilities: Sirin Software vs Infinum
| Capability | Sirin Software | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✗ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Sirin Software vs Infinum
| Framework / platform | Sirin Software | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| MQTT | N/A | N/A |
| Swift | N/A | ✓ |
| Kotlin | N/A | ✓ |
| Flutter | N/A | ✓ |
| React Native | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Sirin Software vs Infinum
| Criterion | Sirin Software | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials, Team extension | Fixed project, Time and materials, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Sirin Software vs Infinum
| Dimension | Sirin Software | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer electronics, Semiconductors, Smart home | Consumer electronics, Smart home, Industrial manufacturing |
| Best use cases | Writing firmware and a companion app for a consumer smart garden or home device., Building SDKs and reference apps for a new chip or development board. | Merging several appliance apps into one connected-home app., Building the community and content features around a device app. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Sirin Software vs Infinum: pros and cons
| Sirin Software | |
|---|---|
| + | Linux board bring-up and driver work are its main specialty |
| + | Can carry a single BLE or Wi-Fi device from firmware to the AWS back end and phone app |
| + | Ukrainian delivery keeps rates below US-based vendors |
| - | Small team, so it cannot staff a large multi-product programme |
| - | Headcount figures vary a lot between directories |
| - | Web dashboard and enterprise integration experience is thinner than its embedded work |
| Infinum | |
|---|---|
| + | Shipped a large consumer appliance IoT app for Versuni (Philips) |
| + | Strong product design and UX process |
| + | EU-based with a mature engineering culture |
| - | No firmware or hardware practice |
| - | IoT is one category within a general digital product agency |
| - | Agency rates sit above smaller Eastern European vendors |
Who should choose Sirin Software?
A typical fit: writing firmware and a companion app for a consumer smart garden or home device.
Embedded Linux and SDK work for semiconductor companies, carried through to the consumer app. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Semiconductors, Smart home, Agritech.
Who should choose Infinum?
A typical fit: merging several appliance apps into one connected-home app.
Product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Smart home, Industrial manufacturing, Fintech.
Decision matrix: Sirin Software vs Infinum
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Sirin Software |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Infinum |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Sirin Software (Not published) vs Infinum (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Sirin Software |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Sirin Software vs Infinum
| Use case | Sirin Software fit | Infinum fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Writing firmware and a companion app for a consumer smart garden or home device. | Strong | Limited | Sirin Software |
| Building SDKs and reference apps for a new chip or development board. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Merging several appliance apps into one connected-home app. | Limited | Strong | Infinum |
| Building the community and content features around a device app. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Sirin Software vs Infinum
Sirin Software (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Embedded Linux and SDK work for semiconductor companies, carried through to the consumer app.
Infinum (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need building the community and content features around a device app. If your situation matches that, Infinum is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Sirin Software vs Infinum FAQ
Is Sirin Software better than Infinum?
Sirin Software (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Sirin Software's strongest advantage: linux board bring-up and driver work are its main specialty. Infinum's strongest advantage: shipped a large consumer appliance IoT app for Versuni (Philips).
How do Sirin Software and Infinum differ in pricing?
Sirin Software uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Infinum uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Sirin Software or Infinum?
Infinum is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Sirin Software and Infinum?
Sirin Software's primary differentiator is: embedded Linux and SDK work for semiconductor companies, carried through to the consumer app. Infinum's primary differentiator is: product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand. They also differ in team size (50–249 vs 350–450), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Consumer electronics, Semiconductors vs Consumer electronics, Smart home).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.