Sirin Software vs ArcTouch: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Sirin Software (4.3/5) edges ahead of ArcTouch (4.0/5) overall. Sirin Software is the better choice for device startups needing Linux firmware plus a companion app. ArcTouch is the stronger option for consumer brands wanting design-led companion apps. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Sirin Software vs ArcTouch: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Sirin Software | ArcTouch |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2008 |
| HQ | Pompano Beach, Florida, USA (R&D in Kyiv and Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine) | San Francisco, California, USA (studio in Florianópolis, Brazil) |
| Team size | 50–249 | 100–250 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Embedded Linux and SDK work for semiconductor companies, carried through to the consumer app | Design-first mobile studio for consumer connected products |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price | Time and materials, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded Linux, Yocto, BLE | Swift, Kotlin, React Native |
| Industries served | Consumer electronics, Semiconductors, Smart home, Agritech | Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Retail, Media |
Sirin Software vs ArcTouch: overview
Sirin Software
Sirin Software is registered in Florida and does its engineering at R&D centres in Kyiv and Ivano-Frankivsk. It has worked since 2014 on embedded Linux, board support, SDKs and the mobile apps that pair with devices. A published Clutch review covers firmware for a smart hose timer that talks to Android and iOS apps and to AWS. The company is small; directory headcounts range from about 37 to 249 depending on the source.
ArcTouch
ArcTouch was founded in San Francisco in 2008 and acquired by Grey Group, part of WPP, in January 2016, when it had 97 employees and an office in Florianópolis, Brazil. Its reputation comes from polished consumer apps, including companion apps for wearables and connected products. Design and mobile engineering are its strengths. It does not do firmware or hardware, so it works best when paired with a device engineering partner.
Services and capabilities: Sirin Software vs ArcTouch
| Capability | Sirin Software | ArcTouch |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✗ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Sirin Software vs ArcTouch
| Framework / platform | Sirin Software | ArcTouch |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Azure | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | ✓ |
| MQTT | N/A | N/A |
| Swift | N/A | ✓ |
| Kotlin | N/A | ✓ |
| Flutter | N/A | ✓ |
| React Native | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Sirin Software vs ArcTouch
| Criterion | Sirin Software | ArcTouch |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials, Team extension | Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Sirin Software vs ArcTouch
| Dimension | Sirin Software | ArcTouch |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer electronics, Semiconductors, Smart home | Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Retail |
| Best use cases | Writing firmware and a companion app for a consumer smart garden or home device., Building SDKs and reference apps for a new chip or development board. | Designing a premium companion app for a consumer wearable., Redesigning the onboarding and pairing flow of an existing device app. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Sirin Software vs ArcTouch: pros and cons
| Sirin Software | |
|---|---|
| + | Linux board bring-up and driver work are its main specialty |
| + | Can carry a single BLE or Wi-Fi device from firmware to the AWS back end and phone app |
| + | Ukrainian delivery keeps rates below US-based vendors |
| - | Small team, so it cannot staff a large multi-product programme |
| - | Headcount figures vary a lot between directories |
| - | Web dashboard and enterprise integration experience is thinner than its embedded work |
| ArcTouch | |
|---|---|
| + | Consumer app design quality is its main selling point |
| + | Wearable and watch app experience |
| + | Brazilian studio helps balance US design-led pricing |
| - | Owned by WPP's Grey Group since 2016, so it is part of an advertising holding company |
| - | No firmware, hardware or deep IoT cloud practice |
| - | Rates reflect US agency pricing |
Who should choose Sirin Software?
A typical fit: writing firmware and a companion app for a consumer smart garden or home device.
Embedded Linux and SDK work for semiconductor companies, carried through to the consumer app. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Semiconductors, Smart home, Agritech.
Who should choose ArcTouch?
A typical fit: designing a premium companion app for a consumer wearable.
Design-first mobile studio for consumer connected products. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Retail, Media.
Decision matrix: Sirin Software vs ArcTouch
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Sirin Software |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Sirin Software (Not published) vs ArcTouch (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Sirin Software |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | ArcTouch |
Use case fit: Sirin Software vs ArcTouch
| Use case | Sirin Software fit | ArcTouch fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Writing firmware and a companion app for a consumer smart garden or home device. | Strong | Limited | Sirin Software |
| Building SDKs and reference apps for a new chip or development board. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Designing a premium companion app for a consumer wearable. | Limited | Strong | ArcTouch |
| Redesigning the onboarding and pairing flow of an existing device app. | Limited | Strong | ArcTouch |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Sirin Software vs ArcTouch
Sirin Software (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Embedded Linux and SDK work for semiconductor companies, carried through to the consumer app.
ArcTouch (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need redesigning the onboarding and pairing flow of an existing device app. If your situation matches that, ArcTouch is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Sirin Software vs ArcTouch FAQ
Is Sirin Software better than ArcTouch?
Sirin Software (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Sirin Software's strongest advantage: linux board bring-up and driver work are its main specialty. ArcTouch's strongest advantage: consumer app design quality is its main selling point.
How do Sirin Software and ArcTouch differ in pricing?
Sirin Software uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. ArcTouch uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Sirin Software or ArcTouch?
ArcTouch is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Sirin Software and ArcTouch?
Sirin Software's primary differentiator is: embedded Linux and SDK work for semiconductor companies, carried through to the consumer app. ArcTouch's primary differentiator is: design-first mobile studio for consumer connected products. They also differ in team size (50–249 vs 100–250), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Consumer electronics, Semiconductors vs Consumer electronics, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.