MobiDev vs Infinum: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
MobiDev (4.1/5) edges ahead of Infinum (4.0/5) overall. MobiDev is the better choice for app-heavy IoT products with AI or AR features. Infinum is the stronger option for appliance makers consolidating several device apps. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
MobiDev vs Infinum: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | MobiDev | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2009 | 2005 |
| HQ | Atlanta, Georgia, USA (R&D in Ukraine and Poland) | Zagreb, Croatia (London office) |
| Team size | 250–500 | 350–450 |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Mobile and web development history plus applied AI and AR work for connected products | Product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team | Time and materials, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Retail, Industrial manufacturing, Smart home | Consumer electronics, Smart home, Industrial manufacturing, Fintech |
MobiDev vs Infinum: overview
MobiDev
Oleg Lola founded MobiDev in Kharkiv in 2009, and the company still runs under his leadership with US and UK legal entities and R&D centres in Ukraine and Poland. Its own company report put the team at 447 people in mid-2022. Connected-device projects joined its mobile and web work around 2014, and it now publishes on AI, AR and IoT. Most of its IoT strength sits in the app and data side rather than in firmware or hardware.
Infinum
Infinum was registered in Zagreb in May 2005 and reported more than 370 people in 2025. Its best-known IoT project is HomeID for Versuni, the Philips appliance maker, which replaced several separate appliance apps with one device companion app and community hub. A Clutch review also describes IoT development and DevOps for a machinery manufacturer on Azure. Infinum is an app and product agency first, with strong design, and does not build hardware.
Services and capabilities: MobiDev vs Infinum
| Capability | MobiDev | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware design | ✗ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✗ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: MobiDev vs Infinum
| Framework / platform | MobiDev | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MQTT | N/A | N/A |
| Swift | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kotlin | ✓ | ✓ |
| Flutter | ✓ | ✓ |
| React Native | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: MobiDev vs Infinum
| Criterion | MobiDev | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time and materials | Fixed project, Time and materials, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: MobiDev vs Infinum
| Dimension | MobiDev | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Retail, Industrial manufacturing | Consumer electronics, Smart home, Industrial manufacturing |
| Best use cases | Adding on-device AI to a connected camera or retail sensor app., Building an AR maintenance app that reads live equipment data. | Merging several appliance apps into one connected-home app., Building the community and content features around a device app. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
MobiDev vs Infinum: pros and cons
| MobiDev | |
|---|---|
| + | More than 15 years of mobile app delivery |
| + | Applied AI and AR experience for apps that interpret device data |
| + | Relocated most staff to safer offices in Chernivtsi and Łódź after 2022 |
| - | Little hardware or deep firmware work |
| - | Headquarters is listed differently across sources (Atlanta, Norcross, Sacramento) |
| - | IoT is a secondary practice next to general app development |
| Infinum | |
|---|---|
| + | Shipped a large consumer appliance IoT app for Versuni (Philips) |
| + | Strong product design and UX process |
| + | EU-based with a mature engineering culture |
| - | No firmware or hardware practice |
| - | IoT is one category within a general digital product agency |
| - | Agency rates sit above smaller Eastern European vendors |
Who should choose MobiDev?
A typical fit: adding on-device AI to a connected camera or retail sensor app.
Mobile and web development history plus applied AI and AR work for connected products. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Retail, Industrial manufacturing, Smart home.
Who should choose Infinum?
A typical fit: merging several appliance apps into one connected-home app.
Product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Smart home, Industrial manufacturing, Fintech.
Decision matrix: MobiDev vs Infinum
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Infinum |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | MobiDev |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: MobiDev (Not published) vs Infinum (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | MobiDev |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: MobiDev vs Infinum
| Use case | MobiDev fit | Infinum fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adding on-device AI to a connected camera or retail sensor app. | Strong | Limited | MobiDev |
| Building an AR maintenance app that reads live equipment data. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Merging several appliance apps into one connected-home app. | Limited | Strong | Infinum |
| Building the community and content features around a device app. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: MobiDev vs Infinum
MobiDev (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Mobile and web development history plus applied AI and AR work for connected products.
Infinum (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need building the community and content features around a device app. If your situation matches that, Infinum is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
MobiDev vs Infinum FAQ
Is MobiDev better than Infinum?
MobiDev (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. MobiDev's strongest advantage: more than 15 years of mobile app delivery. Infinum's strongest advantage: shipped a large consumer appliance IoT app for Versuni (Philips).
How do MobiDev and Infinum differ in pricing?
MobiDev uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Infinum uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: MobiDev or Infinum?
Infinum is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between MobiDev and Infinum?
MobiDev's primary differentiator is: mobile and web development history plus applied AI and AR work for connected products. Infinum's primary differentiator is: product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand. They also differ in team size (250–500 vs 350–450), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Retail vs Consumer electronics, Smart home).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.