Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Spyrosoft (4.1/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for connected products needing device, cloud and app from one vendor. Spyrosoft is the stronger option for automotive HMI and industrial IoT with Polish delivery. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2016 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Wrocław, Poland |
| Team size | 200+ | 1,500+ |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and mobile apps delivered by one team with its own hardware lab | Large Polish embedded and automotive bench assembled quickly through organic growth and acquisitions |
| Pricing model | Fixed price, time and materials, dedicated team | Time and materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | AWS, Azure, Google Cloud | Qt, Embedded Linux, Android Automotive |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Agritech, Consumer electronics, Industrial IoT | Automotive, Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Energy |
Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft: overview
Lemberg Solutions
An IoT app is only as reliable as the firmware and cloud it talks to, and Lemberg Solutions is one of the few vendors on this list that builds all three in-house. Founded in 2007, the company has 200+ employees and offices in Lviv, Hamburg, London and Kraków. Its IoT work covers consulting, cloud architecture with device management and OTA updates, iOS, Android and web apps, embedded software, PCB design and prototyping, all backed by an in-house lab. Named clients include Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink and Bosch Rexroth, and the published case studies include telemetry for Voltfang's energy storage systems and control software for a 360 kW EV charging station.
Spyrosoft
Spyrosoft was set up in Wrocław in 2016 and has grown past 1,500 people in under a decade, including through acquisitions. Its divisions cover embedded systems, automotive HMI, industrial software and cloud, and it is listed on the Warsaw stock exchange's NewConnect market. That growth means a large bench of embedded engineers in Poland. Fast acquisition-led growth also means delivery culture can differ between units, so ask which division would run your project.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hardware design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MQTT | N/A | N/A |
| Swift | N/A | N/A |
| Kotlin | N/A | ✓ |
| Flutter | N/A | N/A |
| React Native | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Team extension, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Time and materials, Team extension |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Automotive, Energy | Automotive, Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | Building an iOS and Android app together with the firmware and cloud for a new connected device., Adding remote monitoring, OTA updates and telemetry to an existing industrial or energy product. | Building an in-vehicle or machine HMI connected to a cloud back end., Scaling an industrial IoT programme with an EU dedicated team. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | One team owns the firmware, cloud back end and companion app, so protocol changes on the device side do not break the app silently |
| + | ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certified, with ISO 13485 listed for medical device work |
| + | Partnerships with semiconductor vendors including NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics help with chip selection and board support |
| + | Edge AI and computer vision experience, from sensor integration to on-device inference |
| + | All intellectual property transfers to the client |
| + | An in-house lab lets the team test apps against real prototypes instead of simulators |
| - | Mass production is not handled in-house, so you need a separate contract manufacturer for volume builds |
| - | The company does not obtain regulatory certification on the client's behalf; it supplies documentation and engineering support for approvals |
| - | A team built for hardware-to-cloud projects is more than you need for a simple app on top of an existing, stable device API |
| Spyrosoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Large pool of embedded and HMI engineers in the EU |
| + | Automotive HMI and Qt experience suits devices with screens |
| + | Public-market listing means some financial transparency |
| - | Acquisition-led growth can mean uneven processes between business units |
| - | Consumer IoT app work is a small part of the portfolio |
| - | Less suited to small fixed-price MVPs |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: building an iOS and Android app together with the firmware and cloud for a new connected device.
Electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and mobile apps delivered by one team with its own hardware lab. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Agritech, Consumer electronics, Industrial IoT.
Who should choose Spyrosoft?
A typical fit: building an in-vehicle or machine HMI connected to a cloud back end.
Large Polish embedded and automotive bench assembled quickly through organic growth and acquisitions. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Energy.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Spyrosoft (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Spyrosoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building an iOS and Android app together with the firmware and cloud for a new connected device. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Adding remote monitoring, OTA updates and telemetry to an existing industrial or energy product. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Building an in-vehicle or machine HMI connected to a cloud back end. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Scaling an industrial IoT programme with an EU dedicated team. | Limited | Strong | Spyrosoft |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and mobile apps delivered by one team with its own hardware lab.
Spyrosoft (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need scaling an industrial IoT programme with an EU dedicated team. If your situation matches that, Spyrosoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Spyrosoft?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: one team owns the firmware, cloud back end and companion app, so protocol changes on the device side do not break the app silently. Spyrosoft's strongest advantage: large pool of embedded and HMI engineers in the EU.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Spyrosoft differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses fixed price, time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Spyrosoft uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Spyrosoft?
Spyrosoft is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Spyrosoft?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and mobile apps delivered by one team with its own hardware lab. Spyrosoft's primary differentiator is: large Polish embedded and automotive bench assembled quickly through organic growth and acquisitions. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 1,500+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Automotive vs Automotive, Industrial manufacturing).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.