Krasamo vs ScienceSoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Krasamo (4.0/5) edges ahead of ScienceSoft (3.8/5) overall. Krasamo is the better choice for north American OEMs wanting nearshore IoT app teams. ScienceSoft is the stronger option for companies wanting IoT from an established IT generalist. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Krasamo vs ScienceSoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Krasamo | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2010 | 1989 |
| HQ | Plano, Texas, USA (offices in Mexico and Panama) | McKinney, Texas, USA |
| Team size | 50–249 | 750+ |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | US consultancy with Mexico and Panama delivery working in American time zones | Three decades of IT consulting with an IoT line inside a wide service catalogue |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price | Fixed price, time and materials |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter | Azure IoT, AWS IoT, .NET |
| Industries served | Smart home, Consumer electronics, Industrial manufacturing, Retail | Healthcare, Industrial manufacturing, Retail, Logistics |
Krasamo vs ScienceSoft: overview
Krasamo
Krasamo was founded in 2010 and works from Plano, Texas, with nearshore offices in Aguascalientes, Mexico and Panama. Craft describes it as an enterprise consultancy focused on IoT and digital modernisation, and a Clutch project listing covers IoT app development for a home security manufacturer. Team estimates vary from about two dozen to 249 depending on the directory. It suits North American buyers who want same-time-zone nearshore delivery.
ScienceSoft
ScienceSoft dates to 1989 and is headquartered in McKinney, Texas, with about 750 employees. It publishes a large amount of IoT material and offers IoT consulting, app development and cloud back ends as one of many service lines. Its broad experience and ISO certifications suit buyers who want a stable generalist. Specialist device engineering is not its strength.
Services and capabilities: Krasamo vs ScienceSoft
| Capability | Krasamo | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware design | ✗ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Krasamo vs ScienceSoft
| Framework / platform | Krasamo | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MQTT | N/A | N/A |
| Swift | ✓ | N/A |
| Kotlin | ✓ | N/A |
| Flutter | ✓ | N/A |
| React Native | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Krasamo vs ScienceSoft
| Criterion | Krasamo | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Time and materials, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Krasamo vs ScienceSoft
| Dimension | Krasamo | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Smart home, Consumer electronics, Industrial manufacturing | Healthcare, Industrial manufacturing, Retail |
| Best use cases | Building a mobile app for a home security or appliance manufacturer., Adding Matter or cloud-to-cloud integrations to a consumer device app. | Building a remote patient monitoring app on commercial devices., Adding IoT data to an existing enterprise app the vendor already supports. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Krasamo vs ScienceSoft: pros and cons
| Krasamo | |
|---|---|
| + | Nearshore teams share working hours with US clients |
| + | Appliance and home security app work fits consumer device makers |
| + | Consulting focus helps with product planning before build |
| - | Small team by some estimates, with inconsistent public headcount |
| - | Limited firmware and hardware capability |
| - | Fewer public case studies than larger vendors |
| ScienceSoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Long track record and stable company history |
| + | ISO 9001 and ISO 27001 certified (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| + | Can handle IoT alongside other enterprise IT needs |
| - | Heavy content marketing overstates how specialised its IoT practice is |
| - | No hardware design |
| - | IoT is one of dozens of service lines |
Who should choose Krasamo?
A typical fit: building a mobile app for a home security or appliance manufacturer.
US consultancy with Mexico and Panama delivery working in American time zones. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Smart home, Consumer electronics, Industrial manufacturing, Retail.
Who should choose ScienceSoft?
A typical fit: building a remote patient monitoring app on commercial devices.
Three decades of IT consulting with an IoT line inside a wide service catalogue. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Industrial manufacturing, Retail, Logistics.
Decision matrix: Krasamo vs ScienceSoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Krasamo |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Krasamo |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Krasamo (Not published) vs ScienceSoft (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Krasamo |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Krasamo |
Use case fit: Krasamo vs ScienceSoft
| Use case | Krasamo fit | ScienceSoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building a mobile app for a home security or appliance manufacturer. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Adding Matter or cloud-to-cloud integrations to a consumer device app. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Building a remote patient monitoring app on commercial devices. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Adding IoT data to an existing enterprise app the vendor already supports. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Krasamo vs ScienceSoft
Krasamo (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. US consultancy with Mexico and Panama delivery working in American time zones.
ScienceSoft (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need adding IoT data to an existing enterprise app the vendor already supports. If your situation matches that, ScienceSoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Krasamo vs ScienceSoft FAQ
Is Krasamo better than ScienceSoft?
Krasamo (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Krasamo's strongest advantage: nearshore teams share working hours with US clients. ScienceSoft's strongest advantage: long track record and stable company history.
How do Krasamo and ScienceSoft differ in pricing?
Krasamo uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. ScienceSoft uses fixed price, time and materials pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Krasamo or ScienceSoft?
Krasamo is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Krasamo and ScienceSoft?
Krasamo's primary differentiator is: US consultancy with Mexico and Panama delivery working in American time zones. ScienceSoft's primary differentiator is: three decades of IT consulting with an IoT line inside a wide service catalogue. They also differ in team size (50–249 vs 750+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Smart home, Consumer electronics vs Healthcare, Industrial manufacturing).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.