Infinum vs SoftServe: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Infinum (4.0/5) edges ahead of SoftServe (3.9/5) overall. Infinum is the better choice for appliance makers consolidating several device apps. SoftServe is the stronger option for enterprise cloud-centric IoT and digital twins. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Infinum vs SoftServe: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Infinum | SoftServe |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2005 | 1993 |
| HQ | Zagreb, Croatia (London office) | Austin, Texas, USA (European hub: Lviv, Ukraine) |
| Team size | 350–450 | 10,000+ |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand | Large cloud consulting practice extending into IoT, robotics and digital twins |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price | Time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter | AWS IoT, Azure IoT, Google Cloud |
| Industries served | Consumer electronics, Smart home, Industrial manufacturing, Fintech | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Retail, Energy |
Infinum vs SoftServe: overview
Infinum
Infinum was registered in Zagreb in May 2005 and reported more than 370 people in 2025. Its best-known IoT project is HomeID for Versuni, the Philips appliance maker, which replaced several separate appliance apps with one device companion app and community hub. A Clutch review also describes IoT development and DevOps for a machinery manufacturer on Azure. Infinum is an app and product agency first, with strong design, and does not build hardware.
SoftServe
SoftServe was founded in Lviv in 1993 and now has its corporate headquarters in Austin, Texas, with more than 10,000 employees. It runs IoT, robotics and digital twin projects alongside cloud consulting, and holds partnerships with the major cloud providers. Its size makes it a strong choice for enterprises that need IoT integrated into existing cloud estates. Small IoT app projects are not where it focuses.
Services and capabilities: Infinum vs SoftServe
| Capability | Infinum | SoftServe |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware design | ✗ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Infinum vs SoftServe
| Framework / platform | Infinum | SoftServe |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MQTT | N/A | N/A |
| Swift | ✓ | N/A |
| Kotlin | ✓ | N/A |
| Flutter | ✓ | N/A |
| React Native | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Infinum vs SoftServe
| Criterion | Infinum | SoftServe |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials, Dedicated team | Dedicated team, Time and materials, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Infinum vs SoftServe
| Dimension | Infinum | SoftServe |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Enterprise |
| Best industries | Consumer electronics, Smart home, Industrial manufacturing | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Retail |
| Best use cases | Merging several appliance apps into one connected-home app., Building the community and content features around a device app. | Building a digital twin of a factory fed by live sensor data., Integrating device data into an enterprise cloud platform. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Infinum vs SoftServe: pros and cons
| Infinum | |
|---|---|
| + | Shipped a large consumer appliance IoT app for Versuni (Philips) |
| + | Strong product design and UX process |
| + | EU-based with a mature engineering culture |
| - | No firmware or hardware practice |
| - | IoT is one category within a general digital product agency |
| - | Agency rates sit above smaller Eastern European vendors |
| SoftServe | |
|---|---|
| + | Deep cloud partnerships with the major hyperscalers |
| + | Digital twin and robotics experience for industrial clients |
| + | Scale for enterprise-wide programmes |
| - | Not a hardware or firmware specialist |
| - | Enterprise focus makes it expensive for small projects |
| - | IoT apps are a small share of its revenue |
Who should choose Infinum?
A typical fit: merging several appliance apps into one connected-home app.
Product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Smart home, Industrial manufacturing, Fintech.
Who should choose SoftServe?
A typical fit: building a digital twin of a factory fed by live sensor data.
Large cloud consulting practice extending into IoT, robotics and digital twins. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Retail, Energy.
Decision matrix: Infinum vs SoftServe
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Infinum |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Infinum |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Infinum (Not published) vs SoftServe (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Infinum |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | SoftServe |
Use case fit: Infinum vs SoftServe
| Use case | Infinum fit | SoftServe fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Merging several appliance apps into one connected-home app. | Strong | Limited | Infinum |
| Building the community and content features around a device app. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Building a digital twin of a factory fed by live sensor data. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Integrating device data into an enterprise cloud platform. | Limited | Strong | SoftServe |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Infinum vs SoftServe
Infinum (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand.
SoftServe (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need integrating device data into an enterprise cloud platform. If your situation matches that, SoftServe is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Infinum vs SoftServe FAQ
Is Infinum better than SoftServe?
Infinum (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Infinum's strongest advantage: shipped a large consumer appliance IoT app for Versuni (Philips). SoftServe's strongest advantage: deep cloud partnerships with the major hyperscalers.
How do Infinum and SoftServe differ in pricing?
Infinum uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. SoftServe uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Infinum or SoftServe?
Infinum is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Infinum and SoftServe?
Infinum's primary differentiator is: product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand. SoftServe's primary differentiator is: large cloud consulting practice extending into IoT, robotics and digital twins. They also differ in team size (350–450 vs 10,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Consumer electronics, Smart home vs Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.