Infinum vs ScienceSoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Infinum (4.0/5) edges ahead of ScienceSoft (3.8/5) overall. Infinum is the better choice for appliance makers consolidating several device apps. ScienceSoft is the stronger option for companies wanting IoT from an established IT generalist. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Infinum vs ScienceSoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Infinum | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2005 | 1989 |
| HQ | Zagreb, Croatia (London office) | McKinney, Texas, USA |
| Team size | 350–450 | 750+ |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand | Three decades of IT consulting with an IoT line inside a wide service catalogue |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price | Fixed price, time and materials |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter | Azure IoT, AWS IoT, .NET |
| Industries served | Consumer electronics, Smart home, Industrial manufacturing, Fintech | Healthcare, Industrial manufacturing, Retail, Logistics |
Infinum vs ScienceSoft: overview
Infinum
Infinum was registered in Zagreb in May 2005 and reported more than 370 people in 2025. Its best-known IoT project is HomeID for Versuni, the Philips appliance maker, which replaced several separate appliance apps with one device companion app and community hub. A Clutch review also describes IoT development and DevOps for a machinery manufacturer on Azure. Infinum is an app and product agency first, with strong design, and does not build hardware.
ScienceSoft
ScienceSoft dates to 1989 and is headquartered in McKinney, Texas, with about 750 employees. It publishes a large amount of IoT material and offers IoT consulting, app development and cloud back ends as one of many service lines. Its broad experience and ISO certifications suit buyers who want a stable generalist. Specialist device engineering is not its strength.
Services and capabilities: Infinum vs ScienceSoft
| Capability | Infinum | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware design | ✗ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Infinum vs ScienceSoft
| Framework / platform | Infinum | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MQTT | N/A | N/A |
| Swift | ✓ | N/A |
| Kotlin | ✓ | N/A |
| Flutter | ✓ | N/A |
| React Native | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Infinum vs ScienceSoft
| Criterion | Infinum | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Time and materials, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Infinum vs ScienceSoft
| Dimension | Infinum | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer electronics, Smart home, Industrial manufacturing | Healthcare, Industrial manufacturing, Retail |
| Best use cases | Merging several appliance apps into one connected-home app., Building the community and content features around a device app. | Building a remote patient monitoring app on commercial devices., Adding IoT data to an existing enterprise app the vendor already supports. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Infinum vs ScienceSoft: pros and cons
| Infinum | |
|---|---|
| + | Shipped a large consumer appliance IoT app for Versuni (Philips) |
| + | Strong product design and UX process |
| + | EU-based with a mature engineering culture |
| - | No firmware or hardware practice |
| - | IoT is one category within a general digital product agency |
| - | Agency rates sit above smaller Eastern European vendors |
| ScienceSoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Long track record and stable company history |
| + | ISO 9001 and ISO 27001 certified (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| + | Can handle IoT alongside other enterprise IT needs |
| - | Heavy content marketing overstates how specialised its IoT practice is |
| - | No hardware design |
| - | IoT is one of dozens of service lines |
Who should choose Infinum?
A typical fit: merging several appliance apps into one connected-home app.
Product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Smart home, Industrial manufacturing, Fintech.
Who should choose ScienceSoft?
A typical fit: building a remote patient monitoring app on commercial devices.
Three decades of IT consulting with an IoT line inside a wide service catalogue. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Industrial manufacturing, Retail, Logistics.
Decision matrix: Infinum vs ScienceSoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Infinum |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Infinum |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Infinum (Not published) vs ScienceSoft (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Infinum |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | ScienceSoft |
Use case fit: Infinum vs ScienceSoft
| Use case | Infinum fit | ScienceSoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Merging several appliance apps into one connected-home app. | Strong | Limited | Infinum |
| Building the community and content features around a device app. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Building a remote patient monitoring app on commercial devices. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Adding IoT data to an existing enterprise app the vendor already supports. | Limited | Strong | ScienceSoft |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Infinum vs ScienceSoft
Infinum (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand.
ScienceSoft (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need adding IoT data to an existing enterprise app the vendor already supports. If your situation matches that, ScienceSoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Infinum vs ScienceSoft FAQ
Is Infinum better than ScienceSoft?
Infinum (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Infinum's strongest advantage: shipped a large consumer appliance IoT app for Versuni (Philips). ScienceSoft's strongest advantage: long track record and stable company history.
How do Infinum and ScienceSoft differ in pricing?
Infinum uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. ScienceSoft uses fixed price, time and materials pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Infinum or ScienceSoft?
Infinum is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Infinum and ScienceSoft?
Infinum's primary differentiator is: product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand. ScienceSoft's primary differentiator is: three decades of IT consulting with an IoT line inside a wide service catalogue. They also differ in team size (350–450 vs 750+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Consumer electronics, Smart home vs Healthcare, Industrial manufacturing).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.