eInfochips vs Sigma Software: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
eInfochips (4.3/5) edges ahead of Sigma Software (4.0/5) overall. eInfochips is the better choice for large OEM programmes needing scale and component supply. Sigma Software is the stronger option for nordic buyers wanting a large Swedish-owned partner. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
eInfochips vs Sigma Software: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | eInfochips | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1994 | 2002 |
| HQ | San Jose, California, USA (engineering HQ: Ahmedabad, India) | Stockholm, Sweden |
| Team size | 1,000–5,000 | 1,001-5,000 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain | Swedish group ownership with large Eastern European engineering capacity |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price | Time and materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | AWS IoT, Azure IoT, Embedded Linux | Embedded C/C++, Azure IoT, AWS |
| Industries served | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Automotive, Consumer electronics, Semiconductors | Automotive, Telecom, Healthcare, Energy |
eInfochips vs Sigma Software: overview
eInfochips
eInfochips was founded in 1994 and became part of Arrow Electronics in January 2018. The company now lists San Jose as headquarters, while most of its engineers work in Ahmedabad and other Indian centres; estimates put the team between about 3,500 and 4,000. It covers silicon, hardware, firmware, cloud and mobile apps, and its tie to Arrow gives clients a direct line into component supply. Few other vendors here can staff a 50-engineer IoT programme on short notice.
Sigma Software
Sigma Software dates to 2002 and is part of Sweden's Sigma group, with its legal base in Stockholm and most engineers in Ukraine and Poland. Headcount is in the 1,001 to 5,000 range. Its embedded and IoT unit sits beside automotive, telecom and gaming practices. The Scandinavian ownership appeals to Nordic buyers, while IoT app projects are a modest share of a broad portfolio.
Services and capabilities: eInfochips vs Sigma Software
| Capability | eInfochips | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hardware design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: eInfochips vs Sigma Software
| Framework / platform | eInfochips | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MQTT | N/A | N/A |
| Swift | N/A | ✓ |
| Kotlin | N/A | ✓ |
| Flutter | N/A | N/A |
| React Native | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: eInfochips vs Sigma Software
| Criterion | eInfochips | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time and materials, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Time and materials, Team extension |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: eInfochips vs Sigma Software
| Dimension | eInfochips | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Mid-market to enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Automotive | Automotive, Telecom, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | Staffing a large OEM's multi-device IoT platform with app and cloud teams., Building industrial gateways and their management apps for global rollout. | Adding a dedicated team to a Nordic manufacturer's connected product programme., Building telemetry dashboards for telecom or energy equipment. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
eInfochips vs Sigma Software: pros and cons
| eInfochips | |
|---|---|
| + | Can staff very large programmes quickly |
| + | Arrow ownership helps with chip availability, reference designs and supply planning |
| + | Covers the full chain from chip-level work to cloud and app |
| + | Indian delivery keeps blended rates competitive for big teams |
| - | Owned by Arrow Electronics since 2018, which may steer component recommendations toward Arrow's line card |
| - | Large-company process can feel slow for a startup MVP |
| - | Founding year is given as 1994 or 1995 depending on the source |
| Sigma Software | |
|---|---|
| + | Can staff large programmes quickly |
| + | Swedish ownership simplifies contracting for Nordic companies |
| + | Embedded practice gives it device-side skills many generalists lack |
| - | IoT apps are a small part of a very broad service list |
| - | Large-company overhead for small projects |
| - | Less hardware design than the specialists ranked higher |
Who should choose eInfochips?
A typical fit: staffing a large OEM's multi-device IoT platform with app and cloud teams.
Arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Automotive, Consumer electronics, Semiconductors.
Who should choose Sigma Software?
A typical fit: adding a dedicated team to a Nordic manufacturer's connected product programme.
Swedish group ownership with large Eastern European engineering capacity. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Telecom, Healthcare, Energy.
Decision matrix: eInfochips vs Sigma Software
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | eInfochips |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | eInfochips |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: eInfochips (Not published) vs Sigma Software (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | eInfochips |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | eInfochips |
Use case fit: eInfochips vs Sigma Software
| Use case | eInfochips fit | Sigma Software fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Staffing a large OEM's multi-device IoT platform with app and cloud teams. | Strong | Limited | eInfochips |
| Building industrial gateways and their management apps for global rollout. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Adding a dedicated team to a Nordic manufacturer's connected product programme. | Limited | Strong | Sigma Software |
| Building telemetry dashboards for telecom or energy equipment. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: eInfochips vs Sigma Software
eInfochips (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain.
Sigma Software (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need building telemetry dashboards for telecom or energy equipment. If your situation matches that, Sigma Software is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
eInfochips vs Sigma Software FAQ
Is eInfochips better than Sigma Software?
eInfochips (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. eInfochips's strongest advantage: can staff very large programmes quickly. Sigma Software's strongest advantage: can staff large programmes quickly.
How do eInfochips and Sigma Software differ in pricing?
eInfochips uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. Sigma Software uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: eInfochips or Sigma Software?
Sigma Software is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between eInfochips and Sigma Software?
eInfochips's primary differentiator is: arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain. Sigma Software's primary differentiator is: swedish group ownership with large Eastern European engineering capacity. They also differ in team size (1,000–5,000 vs 1,001-5,000), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare vs Automotive, Telecom).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.