eInfochips vs Krasamo: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
eInfochips (4.3/5) edges ahead of Krasamo (4.0/5) overall. eInfochips is the better choice for large OEM programmes needing scale and component supply. Krasamo is the stronger option for north American OEMs wanting nearshore IoT app teams. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
eInfochips vs Krasamo: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | eInfochips | Krasamo |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1994 | 2010 |
| HQ | San Jose, California, USA (engineering HQ: Ahmedabad, India) | Plano, Texas, USA (offices in Mexico and Panama) |
| Team size | 1,000–5,000 | 50–249 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain | US consultancy with Mexico and Panama delivery working in American time zones |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price | Time and materials, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | AWS IoT, Azure IoT, Embedded Linux | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter |
| Industries served | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Automotive, Consumer electronics, Semiconductors | Smart home, Consumer electronics, Industrial manufacturing, Retail |
eInfochips vs Krasamo: overview
eInfochips
eInfochips was founded in 1994 and became part of Arrow Electronics in January 2018. The company now lists San Jose as headquarters, while most of its engineers work in Ahmedabad and other Indian centres; estimates put the team between about 3,500 and 4,000. It covers silicon, hardware, firmware, cloud and mobile apps, and its tie to Arrow gives clients a direct line into component supply. Few other vendors here can staff a 50-engineer IoT programme on short notice.
Krasamo
Krasamo was founded in 2010 and works from Plano, Texas, with nearshore offices in Aguascalientes, Mexico and Panama. Craft describes it as an enterprise consultancy focused on IoT and digital modernisation, and a Clutch project listing covers IoT app development for a home security manufacturer. Team estimates vary from about two dozen to 249 depending on the directory. It suits North American buyers who want same-time-zone nearshore delivery.
Services and capabilities: eInfochips vs Krasamo
| Capability | eInfochips | Krasamo |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: eInfochips vs Krasamo
| Framework / platform | eInfochips | Krasamo |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MQTT | N/A | N/A |
| Swift | N/A | ✓ |
| Kotlin | N/A | ✓ |
| Flutter | N/A | ✓ |
| React Native | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: eInfochips vs Krasamo
| Criterion | eInfochips | Krasamo |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time and materials, Fixed project | Fixed project, Time and materials, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: eInfochips vs Krasamo
| Dimension | eInfochips | Krasamo |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Mid-market to enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Automotive | Smart home, Consumer electronics, Industrial manufacturing |
| Best use cases | Staffing a large OEM's multi-device IoT platform with app and cloud teams., Building industrial gateways and their management apps for global rollout. | Building a mobile app for a home security or appliance manufacturer., Adding Matter or cloud-to-cloud integrations to a consumer device app. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
eInfochips vs Krasamo: pros and cons
| eInfochips | |
|---|---|
| + | Can staff very large programmes quickly |
| + | Arrow ownership helps with chip availability, reference designs and supply planning |
| + | Covers the full chain from chip-level work to cloud and app |
| + | Indian delivery keeps blended rates competitive for big teams |
| - | Owned by Arrow Electronics since 2018, which may steer component recommendations toward Arrow's line card |
| - | Large-company process can feel slow for a startup MVP |
| - | Founding year is given as 1994 or 1995 depending on the source |
| Krasamo | |
|---|---|
| + | Nearshore teams share working hours with US clients |
| + | Appliance and home security app work fits consumer device makers |
| + | Consulting focus helps with product planning before build |
| - | Small team by some estimates, with inconsistent public headcount |
| - | Limited firmware and hardware capability |
| - | Fewer public case studies than larger vendors |
Who should choose eInfochips?
A typical fit: staffing a large OEM's multi-device IoT platform with app and cloud teams.
Arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Automotive, Consumer electronics, Semiconductors.
Who should choose Krasamo?
A typical fit: building a mobile app for a home security or appliance manufacturer.
US consultancy with Mexico and Panama delivery working in American time zones. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Smart home, Consumer electronics, Industrial manufacturing, Retail.
Decision matrix: eInfochips vs Krasamo
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | eInfochips |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | eInfochips |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: eInfochips (Not published) vs Krasamo (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | eInfochips |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | eInfochips |
Use case fit: eInfochips vs Krasamo
| Use case | eInfochips fit | Krasamo fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Staffing a large OEM's multi-device IoT platform with app and cloud teams. | Strong | Limited | eInfochips |
| Building industrial gateways and their management apps for global rollout. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Building a mobile app for a home security or appliance manufacturer. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Adding Matter or cloud-to-cloud integrations to a consumer device app. | Limited | Strong | Krasamo |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: eInfochips vs Krasamo
eInfochips (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain.
Krasamo (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need adding Matter or cloud-to-cloud integrations to a consumer device app. If your situation matches that, Krasamo is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
eInfochips vs Krasamo FAQ
Is eInfochips better than Krasamo?
eInfochips (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. eInfochips's strongest advantage: can staff very large programmes quickly. Krasamo's strongest advantage: nearshore teams share working hours with US clients.
How do eInfochips and Krasamo differ in pricing?
eInfochips uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. Krasamo uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: eInfochips or Krasamo?
eInfochips is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between eInfochips and Krasamo?
eInfochips's primary differentiator is: arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain. Krasamo's primary differentiator is: US consultancy with Mexico and Panama delivery working in American time zones. They also differ in team size (1,000–5,000 vs 50–249), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare vs Smart home, Consumer electronics).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.