eInfochips vs Infinum: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
eInfochips (4.3/5) edges ahead of Infinum (4.0/5) overall. eInfochips is the better choice for large OEM programmes needing scale and component supply. Infinum is the stronger option for appliance makers consolidating several device apps. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
eInfochips vs Infinum: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | eInfochips | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1994 | 2005 |
| HQ | San Jose, California, USA (engineering HQ: Ahmedabad, India) | Zagreb, Croatia (London office) |
| Team size | 1,000–5,000 | 350–450 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain | Product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price | Time and materials, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | AWS IoT, Azure IoT, Embedded Linux | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter |
| Industries served | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Automotive, Consumer electronics, Semiconductors | Consumer electronics, Smart home, Industrial manufacturing, Fintech |
eInfochips vs Infinum: overview
eInfochips
eInfochips was founded in 1994 and became part of Arrow Electronics in January 2018. The company now lists San Jose as headquarters, while most of its engineers work in Ahmedabad and other Indian centres; estimates put the team between about 3,500 and 4,000. It covers silicon, hardware, firmware, cloud and mobile apps, and its tie to Arrow gives clients a direct line into component supply. Few other vendors here can staff a 50-engineer IoT programme on short notice.
Infinum
Infinum was registered in Zagreb in May 2005 and reported more than 370 people in 2025. Its best-known IoT project is HomeID for Versuni, the Philips appliance maker, which replaced several separate appliance apps with one device companion app and community hub. A Clutch review also describes IoT development and DevOps for a machinery manufacturer on Azure. Infinum is an app and product agency first, with strong design, and does not build hardware.
Services and capabilities: eInfochips vs Infinum
| Capability | eInfochips | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: eInfochips vs Infinum
| Framework / platform | eInfochips | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MQTT | N/A | N/A |
| Swift | N/A | ✓ |
| Kotlin | N/A | ✓ |
| Flutter | N/A | ✓ |
| React Native | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: eInfochips vs Infinum
| Criterion | eInfochips | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time and materials, Fixed project | Fixed project, Time and materials, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: eInfochips vs Infinum
| Dimension | eInfochips | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Mid-market to enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Automotive | Consumer electronics, Smart home, Industrial manufacturing |
| Best use cases | Staffing a large OEM's multi-device IoT platform with app and cloud teams., Building industrial gateways and their management apps for global rollout. | Merging several appliance apps into one connected-home app., Building the community and content features around a device app. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
eInfochips vs Infinum: pros and cons
| eInfochips | |
|---|---|
| + | Can staff very large programmes quickly |
| + | Arrow ownership helps with chip availability, reference designs and supply planning |
| + | Covers the full chain from chip-level work to cloud and app |
| + | Indian delivery keeps blended rates competitive for big teams |
| - | Owned by Arrow Electronics since 2018, which may steer component recommendations toward Arrow's line card |
| - | Large-company process can feel slow for a startup MVP |
| - | Founding year is given as 1994 or 1995 depending on the source |
| Infinum | |
|---|---|
| + | Shipped a large consumer appliance IoT app for Versuni (Philips) |
| + | Strong product design and UX process |
| + | EU-based with a mature engineering culture |
| - | No firmware or hardware practice |
| - | IoT is one category within a general digital product agency |
| - | Agency rates sit above smaller Eastern European vendors |
Who should choose eInfochips?
A typical fit: staffing a large OEM's multi-device IoT platform with app and cloud teams.
Arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Automotive, Consumer electronics, Semiconductors.
Who should choose Infinum?
A typical fit: merging several appliance apps into one connected-home app.
Product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Smart home, Industrial manufacturing, Fintech.
Decision matrix: eInfochips vs Infinum
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | eInfochips |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | eInfochips |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: eInfochips (Not published) vs Infinum (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | eInfochips |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | eInfochips |
Use case fit: eInfochips vs Infinum
| Use case | eInfochips fit | Infinum fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Staffing a large OEM's multi-device IoT platform with app and cloud teams. | Strong | Limited | eInfochips |
| Building industrial gateways and their management apps for global rollout. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Merging several appliance apps into one connected-home app. | Limited | Strong | Infinum |
| Building the community and content features around a device app. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: eInfochips vs Infinum
eInfochips (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain.
Infinum (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need building the community and content features around a device app. If your situation matches that, Infinum is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
eInfochips vs Infinum FAQ
Is eInfochips better than Infinum?
eInfochips (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. eInfochips's strongest advantage: can staff very large programmes quickly. Infinum's strongest advantage: shipped a large consumer appliance IoT app for Versuni (Philips).
How do eInfochips and Infinum differ in pricing?
eInfochips uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. Infinum uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: eInfochips or Infinum?
eInfochips is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between eInfochips and Infinum?
eInfochips's primary differentiator is: arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain. Infinum's primary differentiator is: product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand. They also differ in team size (1,000–5,000 vs 350–450), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare vs Consumer electronics, Smart home).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.