eInfochips vs ELEKS: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
eInfochips (4.3/5) edges ahead of ELEKS (3.8/5) overall. eInfochips is the better choice for large OEM programmes needing scale and component supply. ELEKS is the stronger option for turning device data into business apps. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
eInfochips vs ELEKS: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | eInfochips | ELEKS |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1994 | 1991 |
| HQ | San Jose, California, USA (engineering HQ: Ahmedabad, India) | Tallinn, Estonia (engineering hub: Lviv, Ukraine) |
| Team size | 1,000–5,000 | 2,000+ |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain | Data science and enterprise app skills applied to IoT data |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price | Time and materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | AWS IoT, Azure IoT, Embedded Linux | Azure, AWS, .NET |
| Industries served | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Automotive, Consumer electronics, Semiconductors | Energy, Logistics, Healthcare, Financial services |
eInfochips vs ELEKS: overview
eInfochips
eInfochips was founded in 1994 and became part of Arrow Electronics in January 2018. The company now lists San Jose as headquarters, while most of its engineers work in Ahmedabad and other Indian centres; estimates put the team between about 3,500 and 4,000. It covers silicon, hardware, firmware, cloud and mobile apps, and its tie to Arrow gives clients a direct line into component supply. Few other vendors here can staff a 50-engineer IoT programme on short notice.
ELEKS
ELEKS was established as a product company in 1991 and now lists Tallinn, Estonia as its headquarters, with most engineers in Ukraine and roughly 2,000 people overall. Its strengths are data science, enterprise software and mobility; IoT work usually appears as part of data or industrial projects. For IoT apps it suits buyers whose main problem is making sense of device data in a business system. It is a weaker fit for device-side engineering.
Services and capabilities: eInfochips vs ELEKS
| Capability | eInfochips | ELEKS |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: eInfochips vs ELEKS
| Framework / platform | eInfochips | ELEKS |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MQTT | N/A | N/A |
| Swift | N/A | N/A |
| Kotlin | N/A | ✓ |
| Flutter | N/A | N/A |
| React Native | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: eInfochips vs ELEKS
| Criterion | eInfochips | ELEKS |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time and materials, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: eInfochips vs ELEKS
| Dimension | eInfochips | ELEKS |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Mid-market to enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Automotive | Energy, Logistics, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | Staffing a large OEM's multi-device IoT platform with app and cloud teams., Building industrial gateways and their management apps for global rollout. | Building analytics dashboards for energy or logistics sensor data., Integrating device data with ERP and business systems. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
eInfochips vs ELEKS: pros and cons
| eInfochips | |
|---|---|
| + | Can staff very large programmes quickly |
| + | Arrow ownership helps with chip availability, reference designs and supply planning |
| + | Covers the full chain from chip-level work to cloud and app |
| + | Indian delivery keeps blended rates competitive for big teams |
| - | Owned by Arrow Electronics since 2018, which may steer component recommendations toward Arrow's line card |
| - | Large-company process can feel slow for a startup MVP |
| - | Founding year is given as 1994 or 1995 depending on the source |
| ELEKS | |
|---|---|
| + | Strong data science and analytics team |
| + | Long delivery history since the early 1990s |
| + | Estonian headquarters places it inside the EU |
| - | Little device-side or firmware work |
| - | IoT is not a named core practice |
| - | Large-firm process for small projects |
Who should choose eInfochips?
A typical fit: staffing a large OEM's multi-device IoT platform with app and cloud teams.
Arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Automotive, Consumer electronics, Semiconductors.
Who should choose ELEKS?
A typical fit: building analytics dashboards for energy or logistics sensor data.
Data science and enterprise app skills applied to IoT data. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Energy, Logistics, Healthcare, Financial services.
Decision matrix: eInfochips vs ELEKS
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | eInfochips |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | eInfochips |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: eInfochips (Not published) vs ELEKS (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | eInfochips |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | eInfochips |
Use case fit: eInfochips vs ELEKS
| Use case | eInfochips fit | ELEKS fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Staffing a large OEM's multi-device IoT platform with app and cloud teams. | Strong | Limited | eInfochips |
| Building industrial gateways and their management apps for global rollout. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Building analytics dashboards for energy or logistics sensor data. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Integrating device data with ERP and business systems. | Limited | Strong | ELEKS |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: eInfochips vs ELEKS
eInfochips (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain.
ELEKS (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need integrating device data with ERP and business systems. If your situation matches that, ELEKS is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
eInfochips vs ELEKS FAQ
Is eInfochips better than ELEKS?
eInfochips (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. eInfochips's strongest advantage: can staff very large programmes quickly. ELEKS's strongest advantage: strong data science and analytics team.
How do eInfochips and ELEKS differ in pricing?
eInfochips uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. ELEKS uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: eInfochips or ELEKS?
eInfochips is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between eInfochips and ELEKS?
eInfochips's primary differentiator is: arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain. ELEKS's primary differentiator is: data science and enterprise app skills applied to IoT data. They also differ in team size (1,000–5,000 vs 2,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare vs Energy, Logistics).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.