Best IoT App Development Companies

Eastern Peak vs ArcTouch: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Eastern Peak (4.0/5) edges ahead of ArcTouch (4.0/5) overall. Eastern Peak is the better choice for startup IoT MVPs on a limited budget. ArcTouch is the stronger option for consumer brands wanting design-led companion apps. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Eastern Peak vs ArcTouch: head-to-head summary

Criterion Eastern Peak ArcTouch
Founded 2012 2008
HQ London, UK (engineering in Kharkiv, Ukraine) San Francisco, California, USA (studio in Florianópolis, Brazil)
Team size 50–249 100–250
Rating 4.0 / 5 4.0 / 5
Primary differentiator UK contracting with Ukrainian delivery rates for startup-sized IoT app builds Design-first mobile studio for consumer connected products
Pricing model Fixed price, time and materials Time and materials, fixed price
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack React Native, Swift, Kotlin Swift, Kotlin, React Native
Industries served Smart home, Logistics, Healthcare, Retail Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Retail, Media

Eastern Peak vs ArcTouch: overview

Eastern Peak

Eastern Peak lists London as its headquarters and Kharkiv as its main engineering base, with further offices in Israel, New York and Manchester. Clutch dates it to 2012 and estimates 50 to 249 staff, while the company's own IoT page claims 250+ (per company website; independently unverifiable). Clutch's service split puts IoT at about a fifth of its work, next to custom web and mobile development. It suits startups that need an MVP app and back end for a connected product, with the device built elsewhere.

ArcTouch

ArcTouch was founded in San Francisco in 2008 and acquired by Grey Group, part of WPP, in January 2016, when it had 97 employees and an office in Florianópolis, Brazil. Its reputation comes from polished consumer apps, including companion apps for wearables and connected products. Design and mobile engineering are its strengths. It does not do firmware or hardware, so it works best when paired with a device engineering partner.

Services and capabilities: Eastern Peak vs ArcTouch

Capability Eastern Peak ArcTouch
Mobile companion apps ✓ ✓
Web dashboards and portals ✓ ✓
IoT cloud back end ✓ ✗
Embedded firmware ✗ ✗
Hardware design ✗ ✗
Edge AI ✗ ✗
Fixed-price projects ✓ ✓
Dedicated team model ✓ ✗

Tech stack comparison: Eastern Peak vs ArcTouch

Framework / platform Eastern Peak ArcTouch
AWS ✓ N/A
Azure N/A N/A
Embedded Linux N/A N/A
BLE N/A ✓
MQTT ✓ N/A
Swift ✓ ✓
Kotlin ✓ ✓
Flutter N/A ✓
React Native ✓ ✓

Pricing comparison: Eastern Peak vs ArcTouch

Criterion Eastern Peak ArcTouch
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Fixed project, Time and materials, Dedicated team Fixed project, Time and materials
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Eastern Peak vs ArcTouch

Dimension Eastern Peak ArcTouch
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Smart home, Logistics, Healthcare Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Retail
Best use cases Building an MVP app and cloud back end for a connected startup product., Developing a smart home app for a device made by a contract manufacturer. Designing a premium companion app for a consumer wearable., Redesigning the onboarding and pairing flow of an existing device app.
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

Eastern Peak vs ArcTouch: pros and cons

Eastern Peak
+ UK entity with Eastern European rates
+ Startup-friendly discovery and MVP packages
+ Regular presence at IoT Tech Expo events signals ongoing IoT work
- IoT is roughly a fifth of its services, per Clutch's breakdown
- Self-reported team size is higher than independent directory estimates
- No hardware design practice
ArcTouch
+ Consumer app design quality is its main selling point
+ Wearable and watch app experience
+ Brazilian studio helps balance US design-led pricing
- Owned by WPP's Grey Group since 2016, so it is part of an advertising holding company
- No firmware, hardware or deep IoT cloud practice
- Rates reflect US agency pricing

Who should choose Eastern Peak?

A typical fit: building an MVP app and cloud back end for a connected startup product.

UK contracting with Ukrainian delivery rates for startup-sized IoT app builds. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Smart home, Logistics, Healthcare, Retail.

Who should choose ArcTouch?

A typical fit: designing a premium companion app for a consumer wearable.

Design-first mobile studio for consumer connected products. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Retail, Media.

Decision matrix: Eastern Peak vs ArcTouch

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Eastern Peak
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Eastern Peak
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Eastern Peak (Not published) vs ArcTouch (Not published)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Eastern Peak
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Eastern Peak

Use case fit: Eastern Peak vs ArcTouch

Use case Eastern Peak fit ArcTouch fit Winner
Building an MVP app and cloud back end for a connected startup product. Strong Strong Both equally
Developing a smart home app for a device made by a contract manufacturer. Strong Limited Eastern Peak
Designing a premium companion app for a consumer wearable. Limited Strong ArcTouch
Redesigning the onboarding and pairing flow of an existing device app. Limited Strong ArcTouch
Fixed-price MVP app Limited Limited Both equally
Long-term dedicated team Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Eastern Peak vs ArcTouch

Eastern Peak (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. UK contracting with Ukrainian delivery rates for startup-sized IoT app builds.

ArcTouch (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need redesigning the onboarding and pairing flow of an existing device app. If your situation matches that, ArcTouch is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Eastern Peak vs ArcTouch FAQ

Is Eastern Peak better than ArcTouch?

Eastern Peak (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Eastern Peak's strongest advantage: UK entity with Eastern European rates. ArcTouch's strongest advantage: consumer app design quality is its main selling point.

How do Eastern Peak and ArcTouch differ in pricing?

Eastern Peak uses fixed price, time and materials pricing. ArcTouch uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Eastern Peak or ArcTouch?

ArcTouch is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Eastern Peak and ArcTouch?

Eastern Peak's primary differentiator is: UK contracting with Ukrainian delivery rates for startup-sized IoT app builds. ArcTouch's primary differentiator is: design-first mobile studio for consumer connected products. They also differ in team size (50–249 vs 100–250), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Smart home, Logistics vs Consumer electronics, Healthcare).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.