DAC.digital vs MobiDev: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
DAC.digital (4.2/5) edges ahead of MobiDev (4.1/5) overall. DAC.digital is the better choice for EU industrial IoT with edge computer vision. MobiDev is the stronger option for app-heavy IoT products with AI or AR features. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
DAC.digital vs MobiDev: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | DAC.digital | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2009 | 2009 |
| HQ | Gdańsk, Poland | Atlanta, Georgia, USA (R&D in Ukraine and Poland) |
| Team size | 50–249 | 250–500 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Embedded and computer vision skills paired with back-end platform work in Poland | Mobile and web development history plus applied AI and AR work for connected products |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team | Time and materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, Python, OpenCV | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter |
| Industries served | Industrial manufacturing, Energy, Healthcare, Logistics | Healthcare, Retail, Industrial manufacturing, Smart home |
DAC.digital vs MobiDev: overview
DAC.digital
DAC.digital has been based in Gdańsk since 2009, and directories put its team somewhere between 50 and 250 people. Its profiles describe work across embedded systems, IoT, computer vision and the back-end platforms that collect device data. For IoT app buyers the appeal is the mix of edge processing and cloud work in one EU-based team. Consumer mobile design is less visible in its public portfolio than industrial and data work.
MobiDev
Oleg Lola founded MobiDev in Kharkiv in 2009, and the company still runs under his leadership with US and UK legal entities and R&D centres in Ukraine and Poland. Its own company report put the team at 447 people in mid-2022. Connected-device projects joined its mobile and web work around 2014, and it now publishes on AI, AR and IoT. Most of its IoT strength sits in the app and data side rather than in firmware or hardware.
Services and capabilities: DAC.digital vs MobiDev
| Capability | DAC.digital | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✗ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware design | ✗ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: DAC.digital vs MobiDev
| Framework / platform | DAC.digital | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MQTT | N/A | N/A |
| Swift | N/A | ✓ |
| Kotlin | N/A | ✓ |
| Flutter | N/A | ✓ |
| React Native | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: DAC.digital vs MobiDev
| Criterion | DAC.digital | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time and materials, Team extension | Dedicated team, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: DAC.digital vs MobiDev
| Dimension | DAC.digital | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial manufacturing, Energy, Healthcare | Healthcare, Retail, Industrial manufacturing |
| Best use cases | Adding camera-based defect detection at the edge with a monitoring dashboard., Building a data platform for industrial sensor fleets. | Adding on-device AI to a connected camera or retail sensor app., Building an AR maintenance app that reads live equipment data. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
DAC.digital vs MobiDev: pros and cons
| DAC.digital | |
|---|---|
| + | Edge computer vision experience suits camera-based monitoring products |
| + | Poland-based delivery inside the EU |
| + | Covers device firmware and the cloud platform behind the app |
| - | Consumer-facing mobile app work is not prominent in its portfolio |
| - | Headcount estimates span a wide range across directories |
| - | Smaller brand recognition outside Poland and Scandinavia |
| MobiDev | |
|---|---|
| + | More than 15 years of mobile app delivery |
| + | Applied AI and AR experience for apps that interpret device data |
| + | Relocated most staff to safer offices in Chernivtsi and Łódź after 2022 |
| - | Little hardware or deep firmware work |
| - | Headquarters is listed differently across sources (Atlanta, Norcross, Sacramento) |
| - | IoT is a secondary practice next to general app development |
Who should choose DAC.digital?
A typical fit: adding camera-based defect detection at the edge with a monitoring dashboard.
Embedded and computer vision skills paired with back-end platform work in Poland. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial manufacturing, Energy, Healthcare, Logistics.
Who should choose MobiDev?
A typical fit: adding on-device AI to a connected camera or retail sensor app.
Mobile and web development history plus applied AI and AR work for connected products. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Retail, Industrial manufacturing, Smart home.
Decision matrix: DAC.digital vs MobiDev
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | DAC.digital |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: DAC.digital (Not published) vs MobiDev (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | DAC.digital |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: DAC.digital vs MobiDev
| Use case | DAC.digital fit | MobiDev fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adding camera-based defect detection at the edge with a monitoring dashboard. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Building a data platform for industrial sensor fleets. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Adding on-device AI to a connected camera or retail sensor app. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Building an AR maintenance app that reads live equipment data. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: DAC.digital vs MobiDev
DAC.digital (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Embedded and computer vision skills paired with back-end platform work in Poland.
MobiDev (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need building an AR maintenance app that reads live equipment data. If your situation matches that, MobiDev is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
DAC.digital vs MobiDev FAQ
Is DAC.digital better than MobiDev?
DAC.digital (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. DAC.digital's strongest advantage: edge computer vision experience suits camera-based monitoring products. MobiDev's strongest advantage: more than 15 years of mobile app delivery.
How do DAC.digital and MobiDev differ in pricing?
DAC.digital uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. MobiDev uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: DAC.digital or MobiDev?
MobiDev is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between DAC.digital and MobiDev?
DAC.digital's primary differentiator is: embedded and computer vision skills paired with back-end platform work in Poland. MobiDev's primary differentiator is: mobile and web development history plus applied AI and AR work for connected products. They also differ in team size (50–249 vs 250–500), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial manufacturing, Energy vs Healthcare, Retail).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.