Cogniteq vs MobiDev: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Cogniteq (4.1/5) edges ahead of MobiDev (4.1/5) overall. Cogniteq is the better choice for BLE companion apps for existing hardware. MobiDev is the stronger option for app-heavy IoT products with AI or AR features. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Cogniteq vs MobiDev: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Cogniteq | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2005 | 2009 |
| HQ | Vilnius, Lithuania | Atlanta, Georgia, USA (R&D in Ukraine and Poland) |
| Team size | 51–200 | 250–500 |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Mobile-first IoT vendor with EU headquarters and moderate rates | Mobile and web development history plus applied AI and AR work for connected products |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price | Time and materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | BLE, Swift, Kotlin | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter |
| Industries served | Smart home, Healthcare, Consumer electronics, Logistics | Healthcare, Retail, Industrial manufacturing, Smart home |
Cogniteq vs MobiDev: overview
Cogniteq
Cogniteq is headquartered in Vilnius and most sources date it to 2005. It describes itself as a custom software company specialising in IoT and mobile solutions, and its portfolio includes BLE device apps, smart home control and telemetry back ends. Team size estimates run from about 80 in-house employees to the 200+ developers claimed on its blog (per company website; independently unverifiable). It is best for app and cloud work where a hardware team already exists.
MobiDev
Oleg Lola founded MobiDev in Kharkiv in 2009, and the company still runs under his leadership with US and UK legal entities and R&D centres in Ukraine and Poland. Its own company report put the team at 447 people in mid-2022. Connected-device projects joined its mobile and web work around 2014, and it now publishes on AI, AR and IoT. Most of its IoT strength sits in the app and data side rather than in firmware or hardware.
Services and capabilities: Cogniteq vs MobiDev
| Capability | Cogniteq | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware design | ✗ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Cogniteq vs MobiDev
| Framework / platform | Cogniteq | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| MQTT | ✓ | N/A |
| Swift | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kotlin | ✓ | ✓ |
| Flutter | ✓ | ✓ |
| React Native | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Cogniteq vs MobiDev
| Criterion | Cogniteq | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials, Dedicated team | Dedicated team, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Cogniteq vs MobiDev
| Dimension | Cogniteq | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Smart home, Healthcare, Consumer electronics | Healthcare, Retail, Industrial manufacturing |
| Best use cases | Building a BLE companion app for a wearable or home device., Developing a smart home control app with cloud sync. | Adding on-device AI to a connected camera or retail sensor app., Building an AR maintenance app that reads live equipment data. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Cogniteq vs MobiDev: pros and cons
| Cogniteq | |
|---|---|
| + | Companion-app and BLE experience is the core of its IoT portfolio |
| + | Lithuanian headquarters places contracts inside the EU |
| + | Mid-sized team gives senior attention on smaller projects |
| - | Limited hardware design capability |
| - | Its own blog publishes IoT company rankings that include itself, so its marketing claims need checking |
| - | Team size claims are inconsistent across sources |
| MobiDev | |
|---|---|
| + | More than 15 years of mobile app delivery |
| + | Applied AI and AR experience for apps that interpret device data |
| + | Relocated most staff to safer offices in Chernivtsi and Łódź after 2022 |
| - | Little hardware or deep firmware work |
| - | Headquarters is listed differently across sources (Atlanta, Norcross, Sacramento) |
| - | IoT is a secondary practice next to general app development |
Who should choose Cogniteq?
A typical fit: building a BLE companion app for a wearable or home device.
Mobile-first IoT vendor with EU headquarters and moderate rates. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Smart home, Healthcare, Consumer electronics, Logistics.
Who should choose MobiDev?
A typical fit: adding on-device AI to a connected camera or retail sensor app.
Mobile and web development history plus applied AI and AR work for connected products. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Retail, Industrial manufacturing, Smart home.
Decision matrix: Cogniteq vs MobiDev
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Cogniteq |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Cogniteq |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Cogniteq (Not published) vs MobiDev (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Cogniteq |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Cogniteq vs MobiDev
| Use case | Cogniteq fit | MobiDev fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building a BLE companion app for a wearable or home device. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Developing a smart home control app with cloud sync. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Adding on-device AI to a connected camera or retail sensor app. | Limited | Strong | MobiDev |
| Building an AR maintenance app that reads live equipment data. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Cogniteq vs MobiDev
Cogniteq (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Mobile-first IoT vendor with EU headquarters and moderate rates.
MobiDev (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need building an AR maintenance app that reads live equipment data. If your situation matches that, MobiDev is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Cogniteq vs MobiDev FAQ
Is Cogniteq better than MobiDev?
Cogniteq (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Cogniteq's strongest advantage: companion-app and BLE experience is the core of its IoT portfolio. MobiDev's strongest advantage: more than 15 years of mobile app delivery.
How do Cogniteq and MobiDev differ in pricing?
Cogniteq uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. MobiDev uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Cogniteq or MobiDev?
MobiDev is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Cogniteq and MobiDev?
Cogniteq's primary differentiator is: mobile-first IoT vendor with EU headquarters and moderate rates. MobiDev's primary differentiator is: mobile and web development history plus applied AI and AR work for connected products. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 250–500), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Smart home, Healthcare vs Healthcare, Retail).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.