Cogniteq vs Infinum: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Cogniteq (4.1/5) edges ahead of Infinum (4.0/5) overall. Cogniteq is the better choice for BLE companion apps for existing hardware. Infinum is the stronger option for appliance makers consolidating several device apps. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Cogniteq vs Infinum: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Cogniteq | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2005 | 2005 |
| HQ | Vilnius, Lithuania | Zagreb, Croatia (London office) |
| Team size | 51–200 | 350–450 |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Mobile-first IoT vendor with EU headquarters and moderate rates | Product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price | Time and materials, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | BLE, Swift, Kotlin | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter |
| Industries served | Smart home, Healthcare, Consumer electronics, Logistics | Consumer electronics, Smart home, Industrial manufacturing, Fintech |
Cogniteq vs Infinum: overview
Cogniteq
Cogniteq is headquartered in Vilnius and most sources date it to 2005. It describes itself as a custom software company specialising in IoT and mobile solutions, and its portfolio includes BLE device apps, smart home control and telemetry back ends. Team size estimates run from about 80 in-house employees to the 200+ developers claimed on its blog (per company website; independently unverifiable). It is best for app and cloud work where a hardware team already exists.
Infinum
Infinum was registered in Zagreb in May 2005 and reported more than 370 people in 2025. Its best-known IoT project is HomeID for Versuni, the Philips appliance maker, which replaced several separate appliance apps with one device companion app and community hub. A Clutch review also describes IoT development and DevOps for a machinery manufacturer on Azure. Infinum is an app and product agency first, with strong design, and does not build hardware.
Services and capabilities: Cogniteq vs Infinum
| Capability | Cogniteq | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware design | ✗ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Cogniteq vs Infinum
| Framework / platform | Cogniteq | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| MQTT | ✓ | N/A |
| Swift | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kotlin | ✓ | ✓ |
| Flutter | ✓ | ✓ |
| React Native | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Cogniteq vs Infinum
| Criterion | Cogniteq | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Time and materials, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Cogniteq vs Infinum
| Dimension | Cogniteq | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Smart home, Healthcare, Consumer electronics | Consumer electronics, Smart home, Industrial manufacturing |
| Best use cases | Building a BLE companion app for a wearable or home device., Developing a smart home control app with cloud sync. | Merging several appliance apps into one connected-home app., Building the community and content features around a device app. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Cogniteq vs Infinum: pros and cons
| Cogniteq | |
|---|---|
| + | Companion-app and BLE experience is the core of its IoT portfolio |
| + | Lithuanian headquarters places contracts inside the EU |
| + | Mid-sized team gives senior attention on smaller projects |
| - | Limited hardware design capability |
| - | Its own blog publishes IoT company rankings that include itself, so its marketing claims need checking |
| - | Team size claims are inconsistent across sources |
| Infinum | |
|---|---|
| + | Shipped a large consumer appliance IoT app for Versuni (Philips) |
| + | Strong product design and UX process |
| + | EU-based with a mature engineering culture |
| - | No firmware or hardware practice |
| - | IoT is one category within a general digital product agency |
| - | Agency rates sit above smaller Eastern European vendors |
Who should choose Cogniteq?
A typical fit: building a BLE companion app for a wearable or home device.
Mobile-first IoT vendor with EU headquarters and moderate rates. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Smart home, Healthcare, Consumer electronics, Logistics.
Who should choose Infinum?
A typical fit: merging several appliance apps into one connected-home app.
Product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Smart home, Industrial manufacturing, Fintech.
Decision matrix: Cogniteq vs Infinum
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Cogniteq |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Cogniteq |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Cogniteq (Not published) vs Infinum (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Cogniteq |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Cogniteq vs Infinum
| Use case | Cogniteq fit | Infinum fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building a BLE companion app for a wearable or home device. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Developing a smart home control app with cloud sync. | Strong | Limited | Cogniteq |
| Merging several appliance apps into one connected-home app. | Limited | Strong | Infinum |
| Building the community and content features around a device app. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Cogniteq vs Infinum
Cogniteq (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Mobile-first IoT vendor with EU headquarters and moderate rates.
Infinum (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need building the community and content features around a device app. If your situation matches that, Infinum is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Cogniteq vs Infinum FAQ
Is Cogniteq better than Infinum?
Cogniteq (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Cogniteq's strongest advantage: companion-app and BLE experience is the core of its IoT portfolio. Infinum's strongest advantage: shipped a large consumer appliance IoT app for Versuni (Philips).
How do Cogniteq and Infinum differ in pricing?
Cogniteq uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Infinum uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Cogniteq or Infinum?
Infinum is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Cogniteq and Infinum?
Cogniteq's primary differentiator is: mobile-first IoT vendor with EU headquarters and moderate rates. Infinum's primary differentiator is: product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 350–450), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Smart home, Healthcare vs Consumer electronics, Smart home).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.